From some socialist asshole:
“You better get ready for… war.”
We are. Question is: are you?
Which reminds me: it’s range time. Now, if you’ll excuse me…
Afterthought: This assumes that we’d be allowed to defend ourselves against attackers, of course.
Okay, I could do this, following an appropriately-sized major crime lottery win:
First improvement I’d make: a clay pigeon station (on the ocean side, away from prying eyes behind binoculars). Second: hang some steel plates between the dock pilings, for some .22 plinking.
Third: some kind of seagoing vessel (screw that helicopter foolishness), for both commuting and fishing purposes:
…and lastly, a Barrett M82A1 rifle, to repel any prospective intruders from distance:
I have the shorter-range issue well covered, as you may imagine.
Feel free to add your suggestions in Comments.
More from The Grand Canyon State:
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes said she will conduct a review of the state’s use of Flock cameras and other automatic license plate readers.
This summer, several Arizona local governments have either ended their contracts with Flock or adjusted their policies with the company.
Mayes said her analysis will consider how Flock cameras are being used, the impact they are having on Arizonans’ privacy and possible Fourth Amendment violations.
The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects Americans from “unreasonable searches and seizures.”
Richie Taylor, communications director for the attorney general, said Arizona towns and cities “have been grappling with these questions on their own, and that’s part of why this review is needed.”
“Issues of constitutional rights and privacy are too great to be decided in isolation at the local level. Attorney General Mayes believes these are questions that deserve a coordinated, statewide approach,” Taylor told The Center Square.
Needless to say, Satan’s representative is right on it:
Paris Lewbel, a spokesperson for Flock, said the company’s license plate readers “capture still, point-in-time images of vehicles in public view.”
“Agencies own and control their data, access is limited to authorized users, every search requires a documented reason, and each search creates a permanent audit trail,” Lewbel told The Center Square.
“More than 40 courts across the country have determined that fixed license plate readers do not violate the Fourth Amendment and cannot track the whole of an individual’s movements,” he added.
Lewbel said misuse of Flock technology is “completely unacceptable,” noting when it does occur, the company believes “accountability matters — including in the cases Arizona agencies are currently reviewing.”
Oh sure. Here’s a newsflash: the fucking courts don’t decide what is or is not a Constitutional abridgement: the People decide, not the courts and especially not law enforcement. And we’ve decided we don’t like being spied upon. A few stolen cars being retrieved doesn’t counterbalance the Fourteenth Amendment, just as a few gun accidents don’t counterbalance the Second.
So there’s one simple response to all that glib claptrap: FOAD, you and your godless, snooping company.
Some chick named Olivia Attwood:
Feel free to add a caption to the above pic, in Comments…
Missing, of course, is any mention of firearms (to deter goblins and scumbags from relieving people from their generator, water, food and all the other stuff).
But speaking of stuff: I estimate that this little list is about 10% of what you would really need should ol’ El Niño come a-calling. (We’ll ignore for the moment that El Niño poses little danger to Britishland. Their biggest danger will be that their own government’s actions are likely to cause total social- and infrastructure collapse.)
Anyway: feel free to list the most egregious omissions, in Comments.
Here (via the Daily Mail ) is a little graphic of how Europe’s political landscape is changing on the topic of dealing with mass “immigration” (invasion):
Notably absent from the above is Britishland. How are they dealing with the issue? Well, officially they aren’t: thousands of “refugees” arrive by boat every week, to be greeted with a cup of tea, free accommodation and, it seems, a license to prey on White British girls.
Needless to say, this little development, then, has caused no end of pearl-clutching:
Britain’s busiest ferry port was blockaded by hundreds of men dressed in black, causing an hours-long gridlock and miles of tailbacks on surrounding roads.
Footage showed demonstrators piling out of the back of a van before they marched through the town, chanting ‘Whose streets? Our streets’ and ‘stop the boats’ as dozens of police officers were called in to follow them.
Politicians have condemned the balaclava-clad mob who stormed the port of Dover yesterday – as migrant protesters warned ‘it’s only the beginning’.
When I first saw pics of this (completely peaceful) protest, I thought it was one of the Antifa-style shows:
But no… these stout bulldogs were just taking a leaf from the Antifa playbook — and considering the attitude of the BritGov lackeys, who are conspicuous by their heavy-handed treatment of these so-called “rightwing” groups (they aren’t), one can’t really blame them.
Also note that there’s no display of “triggering” regalia (that would be the St. George Cross of England) that might give any advance notice to the fuzz as to the group’s identity and motivation.
Interesting times. All these groups — British and European alike — need is an electoral victory à la Trump to start the immigration rollback. And the current crop of Leftist politicians are terrified of such an event, because I suspect that the “rightwing” parties’ repatriation drive will make our ICE look like a bunch of choirboys. (Well, one can only hope.)
Which is why the other political parties form coalitions to stop groups like the German AfD and Austrian FP (see chart above) from coming to power. But they won’t be able to keep the cork in this particularly-well-shaken bottle of fizz to pop for much longer.
Popcorn futures are soaring Over Here…