Confusion, Once More

I’ve written before about how I am sometimes unable to distinguish one celebrity from another in my mind’s eye.  (Once I see side-by-side pics, of course, such confusion disappears, but annoyingly, absent the pics, the confusion will persist.)

Such is the case with two zaftig blondes, namely Brit tottie Hannah Waddingham and Murkin MILF Jennifer Coolidge.  Here are the two, side by side:

I know, they don’t resemble each other at all, except below the neckline.

Oh, and birthdates:  Hannah is the youngin, at 52;  Jennifer is 64.

Vive la difference.  Would, either of them.

Not Generated There

The Divine Sarah points to this article, which is about using A.I. to write something coherent instead of:

Often I’ll write a paragraph and think, “This sentence is terrible.” Not grammatically terrible, structurally terrible. Like it wandered into traffic and got hit by two semicolons.

So I’ll ask AI to smooth it out. Sometimes I use its suggestion. Sometimes I hate its suggestion. Sometimes its suggestion gives me an idea that turns into something completely different.

It’s less “robot writes article” and more “robot sits in the corner saying, ‘Have you considered not writing that sentence like you’re being chased by bees?’”

That’s useful.

There have also been articles that were difficult for me to write.

You know the kind. The ones where your brain is running at about eighty miles an hour while your fingers are trying to steer through tears and frustration, and what comes out looks less like prose than a transcript of someone arguing with a smoke detector.

Those articles were mine.

Yeah, well.  Now I have a confession to make.

I’ve never used A.I. to wrote anything — hell, I don’t even know how to access the thing.  Everything that you have read on these pages for the past twenty-off years was conceived, written and edited by me.  The only time I’ve resorted to technology is when I’ve used Spelchek to make sure that in my haste to get something down, I’ve put “i” before “e” all over the place.  But to use something to check my style or flow?  That’s part of writing, and that’s what I do.

That’s not going to change.

Don’t get me wrong;  I’ll often write something, then when re-reading it, think, “What the hell have you done here?” and set about fixing it.  It’s time-consuming and often exhausting, but it has to be done.

Of course it’s easier to use A.I. to help you write something.  Those of you who have followed my train of thought on the topic, however, will know full well the contempt I feel for using technology to make one’s life “easier”, at the expense of losing control and (perhaps) becoming part of the Machine/Hivemind in the process.

Also, I think that using A.I. is cheating.  When you read something written by someone, that reading should give you an insight not only into the topic, but also into the mind of the writer.  Otherwise, you might as well just give your thoughts to a panel of writers, speechwriters and PR people and say “Here.  Do something with this,” and then publish it under your name.

Which is kinda what you’re doing when you get A.I. to write something for you.

And if you can’t write something without this:

Often I’ll write a paragraph and think, “This sentence is terrible.” Not grammatically terrible, structurally terrible. Like it wandered into traffic and got hit by two semicolons.

…then you need to learn how to write and edit your own stuff.  It’s hard — really hard, ask me how I know this — and often you’ll fail.  In which case it’s time for a rewrite, or a visit to the trashcan.

Mark Twain used to read his daily output to his wife and daughters, because he found that not only could they spot problems in his writing, but the very act of reading something out loud highlighted mistakes and missteps.  He was lucky;  most of us don’t have that sounding-board, and we have to rely on our own devices, skills and indeed patience to get the damn thing right — which is what I do.

And at the end of it all, when that piece of writing is finished, I can look at it with if not pride then at least satisfaction, and say:  “Look wot I done.”

Which is what makes it all worthwhile.  Writing is not a collaborative activity:  PR releases and corporate statements are.

Thanks, but I’ll stick to doing it all on my own.  My Loyal Readers deserve no less.

A.I. delenda est.

Slacking

Sorry about the paucity of posts today.  It being Doc Russia’s birthday, we (Doc, Combat Controller and I) went out for a spot of carousing last night, and the old gulliver’s feeling the effects thereof.

Normal service should resume tomorrow.

Dickie

Back in South Africa, I’d just returned to the office after a lengthy business trip which had involved client meetings in Cape Town (three days), Port Elizabeth (two days), Durban (three days) and Bloemfontein (two days).

I’d avoided going back to Johannesburg by spending a weekend with my mother, who lived just outside Durban, so I hadn’t been in my office for two full weeks.

So that Monday morning I got my coffee and hit the old in-tray with a vengeance, made a few client calls, and was just about to tackle some intensive data analysis and meeting prep (with a couple of Jo’burg clients) when I heard a strange voice saying, “Oh there you are!” in a very plummy, upper-class English accent.

The owner of said accent was a man in his late thirties, immensely tall (about 6’6″) and very bony, with a wide, pleasant smile under a massive mustache.

“And you are?”
“I’m the new chap in Client Service — Richard Dorman is my name.  And I am very glad to make your acquaintance.”
We shook hands, and I said, “Forgive me for asking, but why are you so glad to meet me?”
His smile grew even wider.  “During my T&O [training and orientation], I was repeatedly warned about you and told to avoid you at all costs.  So I’ve been looking all over for you ever since.”
“Why do you think you were warned about me?”
He gave me a serious look and said, “Apparently, you are a world-class drinker, carouser and all-round bad influence.  Well, so am I, and I was wondering if you’d care to slope off at lunchtime for a welcoming tipple, so to speak?”

I never made it back to the office that afternoon.  It was the start of a wonderful friendship.

Dickie was very loud, especially when he found something really funny.  His bellow of a laugh was explosive, and could be heard all the way around the office, no matter where he happened to be at the time.  I too have a loud laugh, so we actually had to avoid each other during the day, because we Had Complaints from the various pecksniffs and Karens that infested the place.

About a year earlier, I had had occasion to have dinner with a man named Lester (forgotten his last name) who’d just taken over as marketing director for a company named Reckitt & Coleman, headquartered in Cape Town.  Les had come up to do his due diligence thing with his ad agency and with his data supplier (A.C. Nielsen), both in Johannesburg.  He’d been told that the ad agency types would be wild and crazy, but the Nielsen folks would be buttoned-down, serious stats types.  In fact, as he told me towards the end of our somewhat drunken dinner, it had been the exact opposite:  the agency people were obviously terrified that they might be replaced by the new guy and were on their best behavior, whereas Nielsen had been their research provider forever and thus more ummm easygoing in our dealings with him.  Even though his company was outside my remit, I had nevertheless been asked to brief him on the retail grocery business (which was), hence our dinner.  His day-to-day contact would be through our Client Service department.

And the man eventually appointed to be their Nielsen client service representative was… Dickie.

Some time later, Les told me this story.

“Richard came down for his first quarterly presentation with me — it was about the Insecticides & Pesticides category — and arrived at my office promptly at 8.30.  He sat down in my visitor’s chair, and placed his briefcase on his knees.
He did nothing for the longest time, and then said, ‘Sirrah!  In here…’ (tapping his briefcase) ‘…I have your data!’
“Well okay, Richard… can we look at it?”
No Sir!”
“What?”
“We first need to celebrate!”
“What?”
“Your quarterly sales results are not only good, my dear chap;  they are magnificent!

Les continued to me: “He then opened his briefcase and proceeded to take out a bottle of French champagne with two glasses, popped the cork before I could protest… and there I was:  drinking champagne in my office at 8.45 in the morning with this British lunatic.”

Nielsen’s data presentations to Reckitt had always been rather dull affairs, with few people bothering to attend the larger, annual ones.  Inside a year, Lester told me, they just about had to sell tickets to manage the demand.  Dickie was a brilliant analyst and a spectacular speaker, and as funny as all hell.  On one occasion, when Reckitt’s market share had improved at the expense of their major competitor Bayer, Dickie had bellowed out, “We’ve got the Huns on the run!  They’re running around with their hands in the air, shouting ‘Kamerad! Kamerad!’ and they’re lying on the ground, flapping their arms and legs in the air like beetles on their backs!”  And Dickie suited the action to the words, himself lying on the ground, waving his enormously-long arms and legs around and howling for mercy in a fake German accent.

According to Les, it took five minutes for order to be restored.

Dickie was even worse in social occasions.  One evening a crowd of us Nielsen folks had gone out to dinner together, whereupon the maniac told us all about his latest sexual conquest, which had taken place on the back seat of his rental car.  Just the visual of the lanky Dickie trying to achieve sexual congress inside the cramped confines of a Toyota Corolla had us in hysterics, but it got even worse when he described how, with his pale, naked buttocks pressed against the side window, his enjoyment had been somewhat curtailed by a policeman rapping loudly on the glass with his flashlight, asking what the hell all the noise was about.

“I think Swanepoel [his generic name for cops]  thought that I was murdering the girl,” was Dickie’s explanation.  “I must say, she was making a fearful racket.”
“More than you?”
“Oh, much more.”

The mind boggled.

Then there was the time, also in Cape Town, when the local Hertz office received a phone call from an indignant Dickie.  “My dear young lady:  your conveyance no longer works as it should.  Can you bring me another?”

What he failed to tell her was that he was as drunk as a sailor on shore leave, had crashed and rolled the car, and was now phoning from a house a hundred yards away.  Small wonder the “conveyance” no longer worked.

Dickie was also a thief.  I always wondered how a single meeting in, say, Durban required him to take full two days out of the office.  His breezy reassurance was that he spent the time preparing the presentations because the IT department always got him the data at the last minute.  That was a common occurrence — I was always getting bitten by that situation myself — so I thought no more of it.  Then one night Dickie confessed to me — whilst much in his cups — that he would take all his dirty laundry with him (in three suitcases), and hand it in to the hotel’s laundry service immediately upon checking in, of course charging the huge amount to his room bill.  “One just doesn’t do one’s own laundry,” he said to me earnestly, “Quite infra dig, not so?”

I have no idea what other expense account items were similarly handled — I suspect a great deal of liquor store purchases disappeared therein, for his home consumption — but I do know that he was never caught at it.  And Nielsen had some serious people in Accounts whose job was to root out just such misdeeds.

One of the other guys at the office once surmised that Dickie obviously came from a good family, but might well have been the so-called “black sheep”, sent away to the Colonies to get on with his life away from Polite Society.  It was a distinct possibility.

After some time, Dickie was transferred to the Nielsen office in Cape Town because most of his clients were based down there, and we kind of lost touch for a while.  While that was not good, it did at least give my liver and kidneys a chance to recover somewhat.

One morning I took a memo out of my in-tray (no email back then, of course) and found that Dickie had been promoted to Account Director — a very large move, as it turned out — and in the memo the department’s head, a tough Kiwi named John Shanahan, was fulsome in his praise of Dickie’s achievements and the appropriateness of his promotion.

So of course I called Dickie to congratulate him.  However, in one of those wonderful examples of corporate efficiency, not only had he not yet received the memo, he hadn’t even received Shanahan’s official letter informing him of the promotion.

“Read it out to me, old chap,” was his request.  So I did, and at the end there was this long silence, ended only by his comment, “Oh.”  Then:  “I suppose that this would be the wrong time to tell Shanahan that I’m resigning, and taking a job that offers greater reward and a better chance of career advancement… as a deckhand on a fishing trawler.”

This time, it was my laugh which shattered the peace of the entire office.

I lost touch with Dickie after I emigrated to the U.S.  I did send him one letter (by snail mail) but got no response.  Given the efficiency of the South African postal service, he probably never received it.  Much later, I heard through the grapevine that he’d gone back to the U.K. and was working at some job in Edinburgh, but I was never able to reestablish contact with him, to my great and enduring sorrow.

I don’t even know if he’s still alive.  Somehow, given Dickie’s penchant for excess and living life to its fullest, I doubt it.

But good grief, it was fun while it lasted.

Not Enough

So we have this situation:  some asshole — who is on parole for an earlier shooting incident — decides to turn his shooty proclivity into industrial-strength mayhem.

Sounds good, dunnit?  Except for this:

[Our shootist] is seen on the sidewalk while firing several shots. He then darts behind and around a white car before running back on the sidewalk.
His frantic escape is then suddenly cut short by the courageous cop, who fires at one shot into the perp’s back.

Wait… the dickhead lets off a whole bunch of shots into a crowd, and the “courageous cop” only shoots him in the back once?

Whatever happened to “double-tap” or “I emptied my magazine into the asshole”?

Oh never mind, I just realized the problem.  It was a cop involved, and every cop (even in Tulsa, I bet) runs the risk of being charged with “using excessive force” (as if any force used against a mass shooter can be excessive) when trying to end a deadly situation.

Bah.  So the scrote was shot, but survived (I bet it was a police-issue 9mm bullet and not a manly .357 Mag or .45 ACP).  Now he’s going to have his hand smacked by our pussified legal system and sent home for tea with his mum.

Charming.