Latest Posts
Keeping Up With The Times
I have often been accused of being an old fuddy-duddy, very set in my ways and against the concept of “change”.
Mostly, I would plead guilty to such charges — and proudly, at that.
However, I am very open to change in one circumstance, that being on the issue of this godless system known as “flocking” — you know, those seemingly-ubiquitous cameras installed to spy on people’s cars and movements thereof. I proudly created this little picture, in fact (and feel free to copy or pass on, as the mood inspires):
I purposely used the word “grex” (Latin word for flock) because as a generic collective term for sheep, it doesn’t refer to any company or individual. Also, I’m a cultural snob (likewise by self-admission) and have an abiding fondness for classical allusions.
Anyway.
So great is my hostility to these fucking things that I may once even have suggested a DIY method for their de-installation:
Of course, as any fule kno, this was merely a tongue-in-cheek suggestion because counter-surveillance (cameras spying on cameras — does it ever end?) makes such an action foolish, even though as a curmudgeonly man of the elder demographic, using something as old-fashioned as a shotgun to take down something so horrible and offensively-modern would give me great pleasure.
But no, we should move with the times, methinks, especially when contemplating the “delenda” part of the above suggestion. So how about something like a “loitering munition“? (I love that particular euphemism, by the way.)
Now, this is also a tongue-in-cheek suggestion, because it’s easy to see that objects like this are waaayyyy overkill — there’s no need for a loiter function, for example, and given the typical fragility of a small camera device, there’s no need for any munitions, per se. Even a kamikaze drone (as used by the military) would be overkill, for the same reasons — and in both cases, too spendy for Mr. Average Citizen to use.
So looking at the matter from a clinical perspective, there’s no need for such things.
But blessed as we are by living in the U.S. of A., there are always other options, such as this one, at only $40 per pop (so to speak):
(link in pic)
I would imagine that an accidental collision between a flocking camera and a drone controlled by a fumbling amateur first-time user might indeed compromise the camera’s operation somewhat.
If you see what I mean.
Progress: not always a Bad Thing, no?
Random Totty
Only For Me, Not For You
Fresno County officials are pushing to let prosecutors carry concealed firearms after a shocking daylight stabbing of a senior deputy district attorney last week.
Supervisor Garry Bredefeld is working with Sheriff John Zanoni and DA Lisa Smittcamp on an ordinance allowing them to be armed on county property.
Sorry, but fuck you. If the ordinary people living in your county can’t carry concealed guns to protect themselves, then nor can you.
Newsflash (for the elites): ordinary people are just as likely to be victims of violent crime as you are, and depriving them of their Constitutional right to self defense, as so often happens in California, is bad enough — so you don’t get to benefit from some “exception” that you might carve out for yourselves.
“Our prosecutors come to work every day committed to pursuing justice, standing up for victims and protecting our community. They should be able to do that work without fear of violence.”
No more than anyone else who gets stabbed just because he was standing outside a convenience store minding his own business, when some mook decides it was time for a little impromptu knife action.
And yeah, I get it that because of their occupation, prosecutors are sometimes likely to become stabbees (as was the case recently)… and I don’t care, especially as California prosecutors are pretty much feral themselves when it comes to, for example, charging some hapless guy with murder just because he whacked a violent criminal in his own living room.
Follow the laws you support, assholes — and you don’t get any special treatment. If you find that you have to change them, change them for everybody, or not at all, and live with the consequences, just like we do.
Ear Worm
I think the most irritating thing about Abba’s music is that the songs’ “hooks” are so good, it’s more difficult to rid yourself of them than a salmon trying to throw a treble hook from its mouth.
For example, this one. All the more evocative because it was released just before one of the girls (I forget which one) got divorced.
Lickspittle
In this specific case, the above insult is directed at that girlyman Rich Lowry at National Review. (Back in the Buckley Days, I actually had a subscription to the Dead Tree National Review for many years. Now? I’d drink old motor oil first.)
Basically, Lowry is fawning all over the foul Flock company and their little snooping cameras, signing their praises to the heavens because:
There’s a reason, though, that police departments so rapidly adopted the cameras — they are an extremely useful investigative tool.
I bet they are. How much so?
The cameras routinely aid in the identification and apprehension of the perpetrators of serious crimes and the location of missing persons.
According to the Jacksonville, Fla., sheriff’s office, the cameras since 2024 have “helped solve 15 murders, 17 kidnappings, 6 forcible sex offenses, nearly 100 shootings, and 172 missing-persons cases.”
That’s over two and a half years, which, compared to the crime stats of said area, is not so great a proportion — and let’s not kid ourselves, we’ll never know how many of those would have been solved anyway, without the “assistance” of Flock..
Here’s the thing. Unlike Lowry, I’m not interested in the entire country surrendering their privacy just to help the fucking police solve a few crimes, any more than I support universal gun confiscation to help the police (I know, it wouldn’t, but it’s the principle I’m arguing here).
You can make an argument for any kind of totalitarian abrogation of rights for the same reason — the old “security vs. freedom” argument we’ve heard so often before.
And finally, we all know that this wholesale collection of individuals’ private information is going to be abused.
“Really, Kim?”
Newsflash: it’s already being abused. From Lowry’s selfsame article:
According to The Washington Post, “Authorities have charged or accused at least 50 law-enforcement officers of using license-plate readers for unauthorized purposes, including to stalk their exes.”
I know that’s not a large number: but it’s a lot greater than zero (which is what it should be).
Lowry’s idiocy continues:
But license plate readers aren’t the only offender. There are all sorts of other surveillance cameras, many of them privately owned and operated, that the police access during investigations.
We let our mobile phones and various apps track us all day long.
And something like 60 million households have Ring or other security cameras that record what’s happening on their property, and often in the immediate surroundings.
Good grief: this idiot can’t even tell the difference between private security activity and State steamrolling. Just because we (voluntarily) do it for ourselves, does not justify the Gummint doing it to us all, without our consent. And the final insult:
The only reliable way to ensure that you aren’t being recorded is to stay inside — and draw the curtains.
Fuck you, you supercilious, condescending little turd. Do you even know what you’re saying?
It’s bad enough when the Commies want to fuck us all over; but to have a nominally “conservative” commentator spew nonsense like this?
Somebody reserve Lowry a seat on the next Air Pinochet flight.