Nowhere To Go

One has to wonder how this tool thought it might end:

A former CIA officer admitted in a plea deal Tuesday that he disclosed details about a secret U.S. intelligence source to a foreign official and embezzled nearly $200 million from the federal government.

David Rush pleaded guilty in Virginia federal court to one count of wire fraud after an FBI raid on his home in May uncovered 298 gold bars worth $46 million, $2.1 million in cash and dozens of luxury items. 

Justice Department officials said Rush embezzled $194 million from the federal government, using his position at the intelligence agency to create an elaborate scheme designed to facilitate his “maximum self-enrichment at the expense of the United States.”

At some point, you have to wonder how this traitorous asshole thought he was going to spend all that moolah without someone eventually saying, “How did he get to buy all that shit, on a government salary?”

Well, obviously he couldn’t, so all he could do was sit on his pile of gold and look at his Rolex collection or whatever.

Pathetic.

If you’re going to do this embezzlement thing on a large scale, or get paid large sums by a foreign government, the least you could do is insist on being paid with bearer bonds;  because the nice thing about bearer bonds is that they don’t weigh anything (relative to gold, for sure), and you can fold them up, travel to — I don’t know, Liechtenstein or Monaco, for example — and use that money to fund a vacation of your dreams.

Live for today, in other words, because at some point, you are going to be discovered and have the dogs sicc’d onto you, and instead of memories of having hot and cold running women catering to your every perverted need in a 5-star hotel room, all you’ll have left is the memory of a pile of gold ingots.

As you’re walking up the steps to the gallows.

(In any just world, that is.  What’s really going to happen is that he’ll go to jail for a few years, then get an early release — because that’s what happens nowadays — and make a fortune by writing a book and getting a job as a “security consultant” on one of the Commie TV networks.)

Don’t get me started.


Sorry, this post should have appeared earlier, but I messed up the time stamp.

 

A Matter Of Survival

When it comes to WWII-era Germans, I have rather a callous attitude towards tales of their suffering at the hands of the Allies — Russians, Brits, Americans, whoever — because it’s easy to say, “They started it.”

But I’ve been thinking a lot about the topic over the past week or so, and especially since I read the appalling fates of the German women in captured Berlin at the hands of the  barbarians  Russian soldiers who were the first into the capital.  Specifically, I refer here to the anonymous diary kept by one such woman, published under the title A Woman In Berlin.  (The movie version can be viewed or purchased through Amazon Prime;  I remember watching it several years ago, and be warned:  it is seriously intense and violent.)

The text, though, is all the more remarkable because of the woman’s clear, almost dry depiction of the plight of all the women, and not just herself.  (That does not in any way diminish the horror, by the way;  I lost count of the times she was raped over the eight weeks of the story.)

Remember that there were very few men in Berlin at that stage of the war:  they were all off fighting the Allied troops.  So the women were largely unprotected against the marauding Soviet soldiers, and believe me, they took full advantage.  Yet even then, there were some interesting asides:  almost to a man, for instance, the soldiers wouldn’t rape a pregnant woman, or one with small children, or the very old women (although of course there were exceptions).

Now I know that women were very much supporters of Nazism — Orwell’s comment still resonates:  “It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy.”  Indeed, I have no doubt that most of the women of Berlin were little different, in the 1930s and early -40s.  And our storyteller also points out, with wry amusement, just how many of them suddenly claimed to have been opposed to the Nazi Party all along.

Still, that didn’t ameliorate their predicament at all.

The amazing thing about it all was how they survived, against all the odds.  Our heroine, for example, very soon made the decision (after several rapes and narrow escapes) that if she was to escape being raped daily by multiple men, she could only survive by hooking up with a Soviet officer and becoming his girlfriend — still a precarious situation, but appallingly cold-blooded all the same.  (She did it not just once, but several times, as officers were posted away or simply disappeared.)

Which brings me to the interesting part of all this.

When the dust had settled and the bullets no longer whistled through the streets, the Germans made a conscious decision to collectively forget all about their conquest and the conditions thereof.  It was a societal repression of memory, a “Don’t talk about it” mentality that was, I suppose, one way of getting away from it.  (It worked only too well, by the way, as an entire generation of Germans born after WWII were in large part ignorant of what had transpired, as the recent history had all but disappeared from German-language history books in primary- and secondary schools.)

The real hero of the story, by the way, is the publisher of A Woman In Berlin, who went to extraordinary lengths to validate that the diary wasn’t some concoction of fictional storytelling, and somehow managed to keep the woman’s identity a secret — despite German journalists of the time, who made a concerted effort to find it out so that they could denigrate her character and discredit the story.  All of this was because the Germans wanted to airbrush the atrocities and more importantly, deny how the conquered women had come to terms with their situation.  (Imagine the indignant:  “No German woman would behave that way!  Das ist unmöglich! “)   It was seen as besmirching the female character, and was part of the head-in-the-sand approach to the events of 1945.

Despite all that, I have to admit to becoming impressed with the women — not just the author, but all the women — simply because in the absence of the men, they started to clean up and rebuild the huge, demolished city, starting with their bombed-out houses and apartments, cleaning the floors and walls, fixing doors and removing the rubble.  There was little complaining, by the way, because they had the very German attitude that there was work to be done, and therefore they had to do it.  (One can only wonder how today’s pampered princesses would cope, or rather not cope under the same circumstances.)  And the author nicknamed herself the “Twelve Mile Woman” because that was how far she had to walk each day through the ruined city to work, just to earn the food ration book that would keep her from starving.

Anyway, the book is well worth the time — more so, I think, than the movie — and I recommend it unreservedly.

One Small Step

…and about time, too:

A federal judge in Oklahoma has ruled that a law enforcement officer violated a woman’s Fourth Amendment rights by searching her vehicle’s history through Flock Safety’s license-plate reader network without obtaining a warrant first.

The decision, which was issued by U.S. District Judge Sara Hill, marks one of the most significant legal challenges to Flock’s expanding surveillance system. 

The ruling does not establish a nationwide legal precedent, but it could give momentum to growing concerns over how police departments use automated license-plate databases to track people’s movements.

The case began when a Tulsa County sheriff’s deputy searched Flock’s database for a California-registered vehicle. 

According to the court, the deputy had no clear investigative justification for running the plate other than the fact that the vehicle was from California.

Yeah, let’s just sniff around under any number of rocks to see what we can find.  Asshole.

You know, when a cop whacks a choirboy / Commie or arrests a pedophile, I’m almost always on the side of the police.  But when they start snooping around in a person’s private life, my position changes 180 degrees, also almost every time.

I’m just glad this little anti-Flock step has been taken.  Let’s hope there are more, much more until the whole fucking shitshow crumbles into dust.

News Summary


...that’s because he’d fallen afoul of the dreaded Witchcraft Lobby.


...got news for you, buddy:  it never does.  I was in Dachau in 2005, and still haven’t forgotten it.


...works for me, and I suspect, works for just about everyone except the farmers who’ve been feeding at the ethanol subsidies trough.


...yeah, they said it would be “free energy” (and it isn’t), and they said it would cause energy costs to go down (and they haven’t).  A pack of fucking lies from top to bottom.


Update:

Conservatives:


...lest anyone gets the wrong idea, here’s a reminder:


...ummm [insert something about the Supremacy Clause here]


...I think that when they answered the job ads, they didn’t quite understand the “job for life” offer.


...I just wonder how he managed to fit those two GIANT BRASS BALLS into that lil’ rowing boat.


...you know, if she wanted to get smacked around and punched in the face, she could have just married a rapper.


...and if they’d just stuck to the old inconvenient Sony Discman and a CD collection, they wouldn’t be having this problem now, would they?

From the Sweeney Files:


...I hope she makes more than a hundred jillion dollars out of all this exposure [sic], just because all the Usual Harpies On The Left™ hate her for being beautiful and conservative.

RFI: Gun Laws

I need some general advice on the above topic, but specifically with regard to the Lone Star State.

If any of my Texas-based Powdered Wigs would care to drop me a line, with your telephone # so we can chat, I’d appreciate it greatly.

Thankee.

(And no, it’s not about me, it’s a hypothetical.)