“You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about.” — Hillary Bitch Clinton, October 10 2018
Fair enough. So let’s list a few of the things that I (and a great many others) stand for, and that I care about, in no specific order (and feel free to add any that I may have forgotten):
- The First and Second Amendments (and the other eight in the Bill of Rights, but most especially the first two)
- A Constitution that cannot be changed by any means other than by amendment, as laid down in the Constitution
- A tri-cameral government system, consisting of the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches
- A judiciary that follows Constitutional precept rather than changing it by judicial fiat or through political belief
- The Electoral College
- Citizen-only voting, with proof of same required before doing so
- Secure borders and controlled immigration
- Low taxes
Now, using Clinton’s own rationale, and considering that her political party stands absolutely foursquare against, and seeks to destroy all the above, I would ask her to explain to me why I should ever be in any way “civil” towards Democrats (or their camp followers, the “Social” Democrats).
While she’s preparing her response, I’ll be down at the range.
– Private property rights
– 10th amendment
– term limits
– in addition to citizen only voting, I’d be in favor of property owner and/or employed only voting. You don’t have any stake in the game, you don’t get a say.
Tis also worthy of note that the part if the1st amendment which the socialist rectums use to justify their vicious and violent demonstrations reads: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” Note the words Peaceably assemble. So constitutionally, the antifa, the black lives matter and the other violent groups should NOT be protected by the 1st amendment.
They really don’t want to acknowledge that while they have the right to protest, their fellow citizens have the right to ignore them.
Hillary always was a malevolent dishonest cnut, but she is too old and stupid now to hide it. Even her own people are looking at her differently.
As an outhouse student of history I think we have a choice. We can kill a few people now as an example for the rest, or have a whole lot of people die later when ‘incivility’ turns into civil war.
We’ll probably opt for the latter, as we always seem to do.
Indeed Hilly’s “Use By” date has past. So much for her ignoring the admonishment that “fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life”.
Yeah, We as a nation typically ignore common sense solutions in favor of the less civil if not downright bloody. That also being some universal history, it’s unfortunate that a dedicated effort aimed at “encouraging the others” will not receive a fair try. Similar to monetary debt, history tends to favor bigger numbers.
HFRC is 100% pure evil in a can. She and her hubby should be so far back in prison they’d never see the light of day again. Obummer and Holder, just to name a couple, should be there as well. “Scandal free administration” my ass. The shit they pulled makes Nixon look like a piker.
Her Shrillness, Hillary the (would be) First, Queen For Life is a bitter seventy year old woman with a philandering husband and no hobbies other than trying to boss her neighbors around. She is the kind of person who makes Homeowners’ Associations such a plague; Stupid, petty, power-hungry, and mean.
I fully expect her to die, foaming at the mouth, on national television.
Soon, I hope?
I do believe this the first time Felonia VonPantsuit and I ever agreed on anything .