News Roundup

Speaking of tranquilized women:


...you had me at “zodiac zealots” — a more polite way to term “superstitious morons”.  And speaking of idiots:


...animal lovers:  no helping them.


...not to mention all those “teens” on the street where she lives in NYfC.


...yeah, how dare they.  And speaking of the Constitution:


...so lemme see:  all-White golf clubs (for example) are Constitutionally protected?  Got it.

It’s the Chicago Way:


...I would suggest that the bonus-holers who put them there are the real trash, but I’m just a man so what do I know?


...adds meaning to the term “Officer Friendly”, dunnit?  Although it must be said that being forced to give a government agent a blowjob is very good training for future citizens.

More Lawn Order News:


...my guess is that his Spanish is going to improve, big time.


...just another example of that famous “British Tolerance”.


...and nobody saw this coming, of course.  [/sarc]

And in INSIGNIFICA:

Finally, in Sporting News:


...have to say, I didn’t see it either:

“Who she?”  you ask.  No idea, but here’s some more of her:

Quite sporty.  And that’s it for the news.

Strange Suggestion

This article made me go “Huh?”

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) is pushing for the FBI to move its headquarters outside of the Washington, D.C., Metropolitan Area, suggesting Alabama as an alternative location.

I’m all for moving the Fibbies out of D.C., but what did Alabama do to deserve this unwarranted intrusion?

I would propose Fairbanks Alaska as the proper relocation option, not because I have anything against the Fairbanksians or Alaska in general, but if anyone can think of a place where these bloodless fucks can better stay out of trouble, I’d be glad to hear it.

Also, I like the idea of Fibbies freezing their asses off for nine months of the year, and living in total darkness for the same period.

Besides, Alaska needs the jobs that such a move would bring.

HOW Much?

I am not a wealth envy-kinda guy, and I generally have no problem with people going after money… but yikes:

Kevin Costner’s estranged wife Christine Baumgartner is awarded $129,000 per month child support – just HALF the amount she demanded – amid VERY ugly divorce war

Do they have a dozen kids that need supporting?  Indeed not:

The former couple share three children: sons Cayden, 16; and Hayes, 14; along with their younger daughter Grace, 13.

They will also be splitting expenses down the middle for the kids’ pricey private school tuition, as well as their extracurricular activities, which includes sports.

Baseball gloves from Gucci, tennis shoes from Jimmy Choo, Tiffany reading lamps, leather-bound autographed first-edition school text books, diamond-encrusted tennis racquets from Fabergé:  I’m amazed that the amount was pushed down to a lousy $129k per month from the $500k / month (!) she’d been seeking.

Here’s what gets in my craw.  If this gold-digging whore (thank you, Mr. William Burr) had been the wife who helped ol’ Kevin become this movie star, I might — might — be a little more sympathetic towards her “needs”.  But no:  Costner ditched his first wife (who had supported him through the lean years before stardom) and went on to marry Wife #2, this tree-gardener woman (after shagging women of the Elle McPherson ilk).

So in a sense, I guess he got what was coming to him, eventually.

I’m just astonished that he could actually afford to pay $129k per month, but then again he’s a big Hollywood star.  (And just to be clear, I actually like him as an actor, and know quite a bit about his background because my late wife Connie was very briefly his agent, back in her Hollywood days.)

The sums of money just make my head spin.

Pants, Pants, Burning Bright

Here’s one who should go close to the head of the line when it comes time for visiting the Great Tree:

During a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Oversight of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, FBI Director Christopher Wray claimed that he doesn’t know how many assets his agency had on the ground on January 6—or whether there were any at all.

I’m old enough to remember when it was a crime or something to lie under oath.  “Perjamas”?  “Purgeworthy”?

Whatever, this asshole should hang third from left.

Gratuitous Gun Pic: Marlin Model 90 O/U (20ga)

Following on from our earlier discussion on .410 shotguns, I went a-browsing for more of said things, and found not one but two Marlin Model 90s at Barnett’s:

Okay, this is by no means a “fine” shotgun, but I have to tell you, I kinda like its sleek look and light weight.

And once again, I am astonished by yet another example of a Marlin gun I’d never heard of.

But for those put off by the nosebleed prices of the “fine” .410 guns and are looking for an acceptable entry-level one either for themself or for a kid / grandkid, this might be a good place to start.

That said, I know nothing about the Model 90 — for all I know, Marlin stopped making them not because of low demand, but because they were utter crap.  Somehow, though, I doubt that.