Common Sense

Finally, some good news:

Double child killer Colin Pitchfork was turned down for parole after it emerged he had been loitering in forests and parks and had approached lone women during his first brief spell of freedom, MailOnline can reveal.

The 63-year-old monster, who raped and murdered 15-year-old schoolgirls Lynda Mann and Dawn Ashworth in the 1980s, lasted barely three months before being recalled to jail in September 2021.

I read a book about this bastard (published shortly after his trial), which described the hunt for the murderer of the two girls.  The way the cops were able to identify him was through his blood type and enzyme pattern (not DNA;  that wasn’t in use back then), which was apparently only held by a tiny percentage of the UK population.  So the cops simply made all the male residents of the villages surrounding the murder site come in and give a blood sample, figuring (correctly) that they could at least be able to create a list of suspects and then narrow that down to one man based on the usual methods (alibi, age, opportunity etc.).  Pitchfork was able to avoid coming in for a long time, and even tried to get a couple of his friends to take the test for him.  But eventually they got him and, faced with the forensic evidence, he was tossed in jail.

There is no doubt of his guilt, and there is no doubt that this sick fucker, in his sixties, is still a clear danger to young girls.  If ever there was a poster boy for the death penalty, Pitchfork is it.

So I’m glad that the parole board has finally come to its senses and denied his release.

In Kim’s world, if he were to be released he’d be met outside the prison gates by a group of angry citizens and dragged to the nearest lamp post for a quick hanging, but no doubt some might have a problem with this eminently reasonable outcome.

News Roundup

And what better target for your new Remington than:


...do I hear an “Amen”?

Still on the Global Cooling Climate Warming Change© front:


...wait, what?  You mean we’ve been lied to all this time?

And in the Great Cultural Assimilation News:


...after all, it’s an acceptable dating tactic back home.


...”Lemme at that infidel poontang!”

In Glueball Jihate News:


...one hopes that this activity catches on and becomes a worldwide trend.


...using gravity and natural resources to solve a problem;  what’s not to like?

In Travel News:


...considering that I wouldn’t live in any of them for free, this is no big deal.


...but over half of all Frenchmen just shrugged when Putin invaded Ukraine.  That karma thing again...


...but as I recall, the guy who originated the crown thing didn’t get paid millions for his gig.

In INSIGNIFICA:

. ...Captain Obvious strikes again!


...yeah, whatever.  Here’s a retrospective of Miss Crazier-Than-A-Sackful-Of-Angry-Cats:

And my favorite pic of her, for all sorts of reasons:

And that’s the news, gawd help us.

Reminder

On this day, a few years ago:

Not that we’re still angry about it, or anything — or else Toyota wouldn’t still be the top-selling automotive brand in the United States.

Finally, Some Good News

…if you’re a compulsive wanker, that is.

While the scientific evidence is still limited, it makes logical sense that regularly using the prostate as it was designed – to create seminal fluid and eject it out of the body – is going to be more beneficial in the longer term than not using it.

The prostate is part-muscle – it contracts during an orgasm to make sure semen goes in the right direction – and all muscles in the body benefit from regular use or they can weaken. And as with any part of the body that secretes fluid, such as the ears or nose, there is a risk of build-up and blockages.

There is some evidence that, if you don’t clear secretions from the prostate, you can end up with an obstruction which, in turn, may cause infection and lead to prostatitis – inflammation of the prostate. This can cause pain and discomfort.

There is also a theory that ejaculating clears the prostate of other potentially inflammatory chemicals.

‘I encourage men with sexual dysfunction to always use an erection. There’s no evidence that abstaining is good for you.’

Ultimately there are no real downsides to upping your sex life – whether solo or with a partner – and lots of potential positives.

And now, if you’ll excuse me…

Oh shuddup.  It’s for my own good.

Unsurprising, Really

From Scottishland comes this report:

Female pupils and staff in ­Scotland’s schools are at risk from an alarming rise in ‘toxic ­masculinity’ which has sparked an urgent classroom crackdown.

Staff report boys using catchphrases that belittle women, pulling at girls’ clothes, sending unwanted explicit photos to female classmates and harassing female teachers.  In one example, a group of boys refused to be taught by one teacher and then distributed a faked pornographic image of her.

Staff also report worrying signs of violence and coercive control in teenage relationships.

Given that boys are always at fault, are belittled for being boys, and in general are being fucked around by female teachers and society in general:

…is it any surprise that at some point, boys are going to respond negatively?

Oh yeah, and according to the article, it’s all Andrew Tate’s fault (and look what happened to him).  The Andrew Tate phenomenon is just a reaction to the pussification of men, really.  If men weren’t being attacked on all sides for just being men, Tate would be a marginal figure and still living in obscurity.

By the way, in looking for the above pic, I found this one:

Now that’s funny.