Here’s a little bit of rank injustice:
Harrods could be forced to pay out tens of millions of pounds to female employees sexually abused by Mohamed Al-Fayed because of ‘systemic wrongdoing’ at store, lawyers say.
The Egypytian businessman has been accused of raping five women during his 25-year tenure at the luxury retail outlet, with at least 15 other women saying they were sexually assaulted by him.
Lawyers have warned that Al-Fayed’s offences could range beyond the allegations made in a BBC documentary, with his other former business interests, including Fulham Football Club, now under scrutiny.
Okay, you may be asking about this “systemic wrongdoing” — i.e. that Harrods had a system in place which either encouraged or else allowed the old goat to molest his female emplyees.
Of course, Harrods doesn’t or didn’t have any such system. But the lawyers have to argue that they did, because:
Al Fayed, who died last year aged 94…
They can’t very well go after him now, you see, so they have to go after the company because, well, because that’s where the bucks are. And it’s really conveeeeenient that the old fart isn’t around to refute the claims now crawling, like their claimants, from the woodwork.
In the reign of Emperor Kim, of course, bullshit like this would be stopped in its tracks because, duh, it’s bullshit. And of course some feeeemales stand tp get a lot of money out of these unsubstantiated accusations, as do their lawyers, which is how this creative nonsense ever came to see the light of day.
‘It seems from the information received from those who have contacted us, and the information brought to light in the BBC documentary, that the abuse of young women at Harrods should properly be described as human sex trafficking,’ said Richard Meeran, a partner at the London law firm Leigh Day.
Ah yes, the old bogeyman “sex trafficking” — where would we be without this handy little catch-all expression? And the BBC… hardly an unimpeachable source.
‘This is because the recruitment of young women for the alleged purpose of sexual exploitation entailed and depended on systemic wrongdoing by the company, its senior managers and security personnel, as well as the ultimate perpetrator.’
So these women were hired for the express purpose of being the Harrods owner’s sex toys? And all the senior management of Harrods were aware of this and did nothing to stop it?
And it’s not just one woman, but a hundred and fifty (always be suspicious of nice round numbers). And all of them have kept their mouths shut for all this time, because…?
I report you decide; but I’ve decided that this — all of it — is arrant bullshit and an attempt to wring money from a wealthy company, just because its erstwhile owner and the “alleged’ perpetrator is dead and can’t defend himself.
Just to be clear on this: Al Fayed probably was a loathsome old bastard who deserved a good hard flogging / ball-kicking for oh-so many reasons. But even given that, it doesn’t mean that this pussymail can be justified.