Yes, they might be outwardly attractive — if you’re into that body type — but for some reason, I have an abiding suspicion that these three conservative chicks would be… unimpressive performers (if you get what I mean). In no specific order:
Ann Coulter
Megyn Kelly
Laura Ingraham
My friend Patterson always claimed that he avoided what he called “Mensa” women because they generally had no sense of humor. I can’t say that about the above three (because I don’t know them that well), but it’s by no means unlikely.
All I know is that I don’t get the same feeling looking at them as I do when I see Salma Hayek or Scarlett Johannsen, for example.
I find Anne to be “striking” at 1st glance, but then as I look more I just go “oh wait, guess not.” And she’s always been WAY too skinny, from when I became aware of her back in the mid-90’s up until now. Skin over bones is not a good look.
Megyn is the one I think is the best looking of them, but it depends on the day whether I go “wow” or just “she’s pretty.”
Laura, IMO, is the quintessential “mid.” Pretty enough, but not a head turner either.
Skinny blondes? No thanks.
Brunettes are better.
Megyn Kelly is attractive, but not hot. Then again I’m no model so YMMV.
Ann Coulter is like minded as a conservative but she’s uglier than a bag of smashed assholes.
Here’s a few conservative women that are very nice to look at in my opinion:
Anna Paulina Luna – by far the best looking woman in Government today in my opinion. Go see for yourself. Looks are free take two.
Elise Stefanik
Lori Chavez-DeRemer
Kelly Ayotte – Governor Elect of New Hampshire.
Marsha Blackburn – (Yes I know Marsha is blonde however she has aged very well and she is a Southern Belle).
They’re still easier on the eyes than Rachel Madcow or Mika whatever her name is. Even Coulter beats them out