You know you’re getting old (or perhaps you just need better focus), when you see this pic:
…and all you can think is, “Fuck, that’s an ugly holster!”
You know you’re getting old (or perhaps you just need better focus), when you see this pic:
…and all you can think is, “Fuck, that’s an ugly holster!”
Saw this pic (detail of #90 in the series) via one of Sarah’s posts. It’s of a Mongolian prisoner circa 1913:
…and it got me thinking. Why doesn’t this become standard prison attire for violent criminals in our system? (I can think of only one improvement, and that’s to add a shackle to the ankle so that the scumbag can’t use the chain as a weapon.) It would make prison breaks somewhat… problematic, shall we say; and to transport a few convicts as a group simply requires the addition of another length of chain.
And please tell me why the thought of a hundred or so MS-13 or Crips gang members thus attired in San Quentin doesn’t give you the Warm & Fuzzies…
Pretty much sums it all up (via Insty).
As I’ve stated elsewhere on these pages, I’m not against prostitution per se, as long as there’s no nasty stuff (enslavement, rape, trafficking etc.) involved. It’s as viable an employment option as any other — and I say this mostly because quite frankly, I’ve just given up even worrying about the morality thereof.
So I’m pleased to see that universities and colleges are becoming trade schools for prostitutes. I mean, seeing as academia now seems to be concerning itself more with certification than with education, why not allow students to get acquainted with what is after all the world’s oldest profession?
According to some study or other, the following are the fastest-growing “sugar baby*” schools in the United States:
As a graduate of UNT, I am unable to understand how this school could be ranked where it is. When I was on campus, there were some beautiful girls there, to be sure, but most looked and smelled like badgers. (By way of explanation, that’s because UNT is notable for having a large number of eco-loons, Greenies and socialists [some redundancy] in its student body.)
And I can only explain the appearance of Rutgers, Columbia and NYU on the list because it’s so damn expensive to live in upstate New Jersey and New York that the girls have to ummmm supplement their income to make ends meet. (What their male students have to do, I don’t wanna know.) Feel free to add your explanation in Comments, should your alma mater appear on the above list.
I am not surprised, by the way, that the “elite” schools don’t appear anywhere; I would imagine that women attending Harvard and Princeton, to name but two, are amply supported by Daddy’s money, and therefore have no need to rent out their bodies to pay the tuition fees. The same is probably true even on a local scale, which would account for the non-listing of schools like Texas’s SMU and UT-Austin, where I’ve seen coeds wearing fur coats to classes in winter, said fur coats probably having come from their actual fathers rather than from sugar daddies — although nowadays, who could tell?
*Young women who fuck older, wealthy men in return for being “looked after”. Hence the title of this piece.
Among the gun-controller / -abolitionist crowd, we often hear the tripe trope that “Guns should be kept at gun clubs, which should be the only place you get to shoot them” and “All gun owners should be registered members of gun clubs”, and so on, all to do with how wonderful gun clubs are in terms of controlling gun use and allowing only lawful shooting. This, supposedly, will help end illegal gun use by criminals / terrorists / Trump supporters etc.
Then we see this little snippet:
Christchurch terror suspect ‘was member of New Zealand gun club where he practised shooting SAME AR-15 rifles used in horrific mosque massacres that left 49 dead’
…and another cherished little belief goes up in flames.
Gun clubs, and the restrictions attached thereto, do as much to stop random acts of violent crime as any of the other nostrums proposed by gun controllers, i.e. practically nothing.
So stop that shit. You’re not fooling anyone except others of your own ilk.
Afterthought: I would point out that this asshole, who was captured in the very act of his villainy, is no more a “suspect” than I’m a Democrat, but that’s an argument for another time.