I made an observation the other day that the prices of new bolt-action rifles of any kind of quality seem to have crept up over the $1,000 mark. (I make exception here for the “budget” rifles like the Savage Axis line, by the way.)
But it’s even worse for that old stand-by of the impecunious, American mil-surps. Here, some guy sounds off about this phenomenon, and he’s absolutely right.
Given that mil-surp rifles were almost by definition produced in the jillions, they should cost no more than a few hundred dollars, even supposing that a half-jillion people want to buy these old beauties (unlikely) and especially during these times of Bidenflation. [FJB]
Here’s a random sample from Collectors:
Even an old beater is over $500:
Don’t even get me started on the Garands and M1 Carbines:
The furrin bolt-action rifles of the same vintage aren’t any exception:
These old bolties shouldn’t cost more than $600, even today. They have outdated (ergo expensive-to-feed) chamberings and are mostly battered beyond belief. That’s always been their charm — that, and the fact that you could pick one up for a few hundred bucks.
Nowadays? No chance.
In fact, the only “bargains” below $1,000 are the crappy Arisakas, Carcanos, Mosins and such. (The good Arisakas — not the “last-ditch” ones made in uncle Yoshi’s garden shed — fetch prices very close to the Enfields and Mausers as above.)
(A special mention goes to the Swedish 1896 and Schmidt-Rubin 1911 rifles, which remain well below the $1,000 red line and are still excellent rifles, albeit expensive / hard to feed, especially the latter because of their ammo costs. Even Prvi Partizan stuff is spendy.)
“Yeah, Kim,” I hear you say, “but those are Collectors prices — and they’re not known for bargains.”
Tell you what: go to your next local gun show, look for quality rifles of the above makes (i.e. that haven’t been bubba’d and have matching serial numbers and decent bores), and if you find one below a grand, buy it, send me pictorial proof thereof and I’ll send you a box of ammo for it.