I see that Dita Von Teese (51) has released her own line of lingerie. Well, who better?
Sumptuous, as always.
Author: Kim du Toit
Caption Competition #360
Your suggestions in Comments.
Here We Go Again
Never one to shrink from pouring water into a sinking ship, Willie Brown’s ex-mistress is supporting an action that everybody knows doesn’t work, is un-Constitutional, and can’t be enforced:
Banning AR-15s, AK-47s, and other firearms that Democrats describe as “assault weapons” has been part of Harris’s gun control agenda since she vied for the Democrat presidential nomination in 2019. Moreover, Harris made clear during the 2019 nominating cycle that she would enact such a ban via executive action if elected.
Well, far be it for me to oppose such silliness, but here’s a little FYI for anyone who may not yet own any such terrible weapons (links are in the pics):
No need to thank me; it’s all part of the service. (And those prices are quite tasty, if I may say so.)
Oh, and I almost forgot the important part:
Guns are no good without a sufficient quantity of boolets, after all.
Turnaround
Speaking of foul political females, I see that Her Filthiness has opened her fat yap again:
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Monday called for Americans to be “criminally charged” if they engage in speech that sounds like Russian propaganda.
Some might say that just a few decades ago, such charges could have been brought against Clinton herself.
But of course, four decades ago it wasn’t “Russia” but the “Soviet Union”.
Rancid Stalinist bitch.
Muzzling Free Speech
And speaking of people who want to attack our First Amendment, we show some foreign interference (and no, it ain’t Russians):
BRITAIN was once the envy of the world for our legal right to free speech*. However, the tide has turned, and the government’s Counter Disinformation Unit (CDU), set up in 2019 and instructed in March 2020 to combat the spread of ‘false coronavirus information online’, has helped the United States establish a dedicated team to crush what it sees as dissent.
In the name of ‘misinformation’ and ‘disinformation’, the CDU focused on coercing social media giants to execute ‘government-wide censorship efforts’. It has now exported its blueprint to the US, despite the fact that America’s prized First Amendment specifically protects citizens’ right to express themselves freely.
*Of course, it’s a lot easier to understand this when you realize that for all its so-called “storied freedoms”, Britain has never had absolute freedom of speech, nor anything approaching it.
A duty-of-care principle was established in the UK in 1932, and it is this anti-harm legislation the British government used to demand censorship of social media content, since reinforced by the Online Safety Act passed in October 2023.
Needless to say, though, their foulness found fertile governmental soil Over Here:
In August 2021 the Biden White House hosted a team from the CDU. They taught the Biden-Harris National Security Council (NSC), an interagency policy committee (IPC), everything they knew about silencing government critics on social media.
Feel free to read the disgusting details, if you think you can stand it.
Me, I’m off to the range.
No Place For Children
It seems like only yesterday (actually, a month ago) when I made this comment about bars and pubs:
The business of a pub is to serve booze to grownups. End of.
You can imagine my irritation, therefore, when I saw this little bit of nonsense:
Two fuming mums have criticised a historic pub for not catering properly for their kids — and claim their youngsters were told to “turn the iPads down” while they were dining.
The angry mothers took to Tripadvisor to deliver two bruising one-star reviews of Victorian pub Sam’s Chop House after having Sunday lunch there.
They say that no children’s menus were offered, not enough high chairs were available and that they were left appalled when asked by staff to turn down the iPads their brood were watching in the restaurant.
The mums said they were told they were not allowed to take their prams into the restaurant, “which was fine”.
Big of them. Then:
“I’d rather have gone to Toby Carvery for half the price and a much more decent roast dinner than atrocious meal they call Sunday roast.”
I bet the staff, and all the other patrons, wished they had. All of which begs the question: why didn’t they go to Toby’s instead of a basement pub?
Okay, I have no plans to visit Manchester in the future (Mr. Free Market: “Never venture north of the M4, dear heart” ) but if I ever do, I’ll be heading to Sam’s Chop House, you betcha. It sounds like my kinda place. I don’t consult any of the so-called “ratings” websites like TripAdvisor much anyway, but if I were to do so and found a one-star rating like the above, I’d be more likely to go there because it means that Management has the right idea about how to run a drinking establishment.
Kids have no place in a pub. It’s not as though there aren’t enough fucking eating establishments everywhere that cater to the rugrats, that parents have to take their precious brood into a booze palace and disturb the serious drinkers.
Fach.