With all the Christmas excitement and such, I forgot to mention that Carol Vorderman turned 60 last week.
And a flashback to her 50th:
Yer welcome.
With all the Christmas excitement and such, I forgot to mention that Carol Vorderman turned 60 last week.
And a flashback to her 50th:
Yer welcome.
Seen SOTI:
“You’ve got to understand that Farrah [Fawcett] was larger than life in 1980. Not in a forced-manufactured Lady Gaga kind of way, but in a genuine ‘Good Lord, Farrah makes me sweat profusely!’ kind of way.”
Yup.
I know we just looked at Kelly Brook yesterday, but I’m so weak:
Go on, shout at me in Comments. You know you want to.
In all the frenzy of Chinkvirus panic and the resulting pandemic theater (i.e wearing face condoms which, from all accounts, do little or nothing to actually prevent the spread of the virus, but like the TSA at airports, at least give the appearance of Doing Something ), we have this wonderful example of I-don’t-give-a-fuckitude from someone named Lana Del Rey:
Heheheh… if you’re going to show absolute contempt, then this is the way to do it.
Of course, the uproar has been intense:
Taking to Twitter to share their anger, one person said: ‘I cant belive lana is actually wearing this mask to…..socially interact with people..this is so irresponsible.’
A different fan put: ‘Why is she at an event with a bunch of people wearing a mesh mask??? I love Lana but this is incredibly irresponsible.’
Another follower commented: ‘LANA WEARING A MESH MASK TO AN EVENT FOR HER POETRY WTF So irresponsible.’
…etc. etc. etc.
Me, I’m just chuckling, because you know what’s coming up next, don’t you?
Wait for it…
Government regulations mandating a minimum thread count per inch for cloth face masks!
You heard it here first.
Here’s an easy one. We all know that this pic of some Miss Universe (1952) contestants contains something “wrong”. But time yourself to see how long it takes you to discover it.
Start counting the seconds… now.
Lovely, aren’t they?
Back in the day when airline flying meant a chance to ogle some beautiful young women in uniform, they were called “stewardesses” or “stews”. Often, the airlines enforced a “no married women” and even an age limit policy for the stews because, the reasoning went, if the stews had families, they’d be affected by the absense of Mommy while she’d be out of town so often. So We The Passengers had to put up with stuff like this:
Then some asswipe in Big Airline HR decided that this was eeeevil and anti-womyns or something, with the result that nowadays, international flights resemble Grab-A-Granny Night at TGI Friday, or Open Bar Night at The Villages. (No pics, I can’t bear the thought.)
Then last year, Sports Illustrated took some shit because, and I quote:
“…the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue doesn’t care about plus-sized women, athletes, or religious models. It cares about staying relevant while also profiting off men buying a magazine to drool over hot women. These silly claims of empowerment through the swimsuit issue cannot change the fact that pages of sexualized women marketed toward men are inherently sexist, insulting, and gross.”
(I even talked about it here.)
Needless to say, the stupids at Sports Illustrated decided to make their crap magazine yet more crappy, by taking the above criticism to heart for this year’s T&A issue, hence this appalling prospect:
Wait till you see the “plus-sized” (i.e. grossly overweight) entrant… it’ll put you off chocolate cake for life. (By the way, the granny in the above pic is quite hot, IMO, but if yer gonna put some granny-aged totty in a bikini, why not someone like Sharon Stone, or Stephanie Seymour?)
This modern attitude towards women’s bodies is starting to get to me. As are the Woke Generation, in toto.