Paid ‘Professional Agitators’ Are Fomenting Violence on America’s Campuses
…leading to the question: so who is doing the paying? Silly rabbits:
George Soros-Connected Groups Paying for Antisemitic Campus Protests, Calling for Revolution
…which in turn leads to my question: Why hasn’t this old fucking Nazi’s U.S. citizenship been revoked yet?
Of late, New Wife and I have been watching the “24 Hours in A&E” TV show on Amazon in the evening. Of course, it being a Brit show, it comes off as a PR blowjob for the NHS, because the doctors are all wonderful, the facilities are excellent, the care immediate and so on.
Of course, the episodes are carefully located in the two best hospitals in the U.K. (London’s King’s College in the early seasons, and St. George’s in the subsequent ones), where all the above is true. Were the show to be filmed in any of the other regional NHS hospitals, the show would include things like hours-long waits for a simple CT scan, 12-hour (or longer) waits for treatment of “non-life-threatening” ailments, inadequate ambulance service, incompetent / uncaring staff and all the other horrible stuff that are so much a part of the NHS, and which is reported upon almost daily in their newspapers.
But all that’s just background.
A couple of nights ago, one patient featured was a Spanish guy who had come off his bike and fractured his ankle. Part of the background was an interview with his “partner”, an Italian woman with whom he had shared his life for many years.
They were, in simple terms, anarchists who had taken part in violent street demonstrations all over Europe and the UK, and when not doing so, were professional squatters, who took over unoccupied houses and lived in them, all excused with the simple excuse: “There were homeless people, and there were unused houses; so we just redressed the balance.”
Being anarchists, of course, the concept of “private property” had no meaning to them, and so these fucking freeloaders could live rent-free and indulge themselves in their pointless “world-changing” little games of street theater.
New Wife had to shush me because I became increasingly angry as the tale unfolded, and started yelling invective at the TV, as any sane person would.
The final straw came when we learned that this Eurotrash pair had since become parents of two children, and the family was now living in a rented house as ordinary citizens.
Of course, what I wanted to happen was for them to go out for an afternoon visit to the park with their kids, and return to find that their house had been taken over by squatters. But I was denied that karma, unfortunately.
All this came to mind when I read this little piece, sent to me by a Reader:
Squatting, whereby strangers move into the properties of American homeowners and refuse to leave, has quickly become part of the zeitgeist as a series of news-making stories have shocked the nation.
Squatters can gain certain legal rights under specific conditions, such as continuous occupation for a defined period, typically ranging from 5 to 20 years, depending on the state. In some states where laws make it difficult for police to intervene, including New York, homeowners and landlords are left with few options to reclaim their property. Many victims are forced to submit to costly and lengthy civil processes.
Of course, the main reason behind the latter silliness is that squatting is being treated by government as a civil process rather than as a criminal one. Considering that the primary (some would say it should be the only) function of government is to guarantee and enforce property rights, this abandonment of the criminal for the civil is disgusting per se, but we can talk about that some other time.
In the meantime:
Real estate mogul Shawn Meaike is concerned how hard-working, well-intentioned Americans will handle squatting issues as they grow more and more desperate.
“People are going to start taking matters into their own hands. That’s what we do when there is lawlessness,” Meaike told Fox News Digital.
“Something really bad is going to happen,” he said. “Am I saying this right thing to do? No, I’m not.”
Well, I am saying that it is the right thing to do.
Because when government fails to do its duty, then citizens have every right to take the law back into its own hands, in this case, to protect their private property from the theft thereof by others.
Let me be even more specific.
If I were to come back to my own house to find it being unlawfully occupied by some scrotes and they refused to vacate the property immediately, there would be gunfire, and a lot of it.
And the cops? They could come and collect the bodies and my statement of having been in fear for my life, having been threatened by the late criminals.
This anarchy bullshit? It needs to come to an end, and if the State is unable or unwilling to fulfill its primary duty, then they have to understand that people will “start taking matters into their own hands”.
“They bought a property. They believe in the American dream. They wanted to get ahead. And the American dream became the American nightmare because somebody took what was theirs and the law was on the criminal’s side. It’s a scary place to be,” Meaike said.
He suspects that victims are already starting to get desperate as police offers in liberal-run states aren’t able to help..
All the handwringing and sympathy for these criminals, and misplaced respect for the law as it’s being perverted by government doesn’t mean shit. We are, or used to be, a nation of laws; and foremost among these were laws that define and protect both the concept and the substance of private property. If the State (or state, such as California or New York) has abrogated its duty, they need to accept the consequences thereof.
And by the way: the “rights” of the squatters? They don’t have any. They’re fucking thieves and criminals, no matter what the law thinks. It’s the property owners who have rights, by law — and those rights include government protecting their property from misappropriation.
End of story.
Background: the Irish government decided to resettle a few hundred “asylum seekers” in this small town, but the locals didn’t want any part of it.
Needless to say, a bunch of antifa types and journalists [lots of overlap] converged on the scene to break up the protest, because antifa is all about mostly peaceful protesting, you know.
“Wait a minute, Kim,” you may say, “how can you say there’s overlap between antifa thugs and the media?”
Ummm well, there’s this:
A small group of men arrived in the afternoon of Saturday April 6th to the old Crown Paints Factory in Coolock which is being picketed by locals opposing the plantation of up to 1000 asylum seekers there. They arrived to counterprotest and take footage.
According to video and our sources, the men were told to leave as they allegedly posed a risk to the women and children at the protest.
When they wouldn’t move on, they were apprehended by the locals, had their flags seized, and forced to vacate the area.
You say: “All well and good; but what’s that got to do with that ‘overlap’ you spoke about?”
Here we go:
Some of the protestors dropped their mobile phones, unlocked, at the scene, along with other belongings such as driver’s licenses and UK identification.
The protestors reviewed the content of the phones to delete any invasive content that had been recorded.
On one phone, which seems to belong to a mainstream journalist, would appear to show a concerning level of cooperation between various media sources, NGO workers, and prominent antifa operatives in both Ireland and the UK.
Wow: terrorsymps among the media; who’d a thunk it?
Yeah, I can’t wait for The Glorious Day either.
Well now, this is interesting:
Law enforcement officials with the Fort Worth Police Department shut down Antifa agitators over the weekend who counter-protested a small group of demonstrators from “Protect Texas Kids” who were protesting a drag show event.
One would think: why? Surely, if someone protests, and another counter-protests, then both are protected?
Well yes, except that this was Pantifa, and their “counter-protest” was anything but peaceful:
During the event, “officers observed a member of the counter-protest group, later identified as 20-year-old Samuel Fowlkes, approach the ‘Protect Texas Kids’ protesters and spray them with pepper spray.”
And, even better, there’s video of all of it. Note the paramilitary outfits of the Pantifas, complete with guns.
The FWPD are to be commended for not shooting these little fascist assholes dead.
We know that of all the games played in the world, snooker is the worst offender, environmentally-speaking.
Okay, if it isn’t, then how would one explain this activity?
One’s initial reaction to this little silliness, of course, runs to hanging or impalement. But snooker’s a gentle game, so I think a gentler punishment is called for, something not as extreme.
So if we all agree that flogging is appropriate, then the only remaining question is:
How many strokes?
Your recommendations in Comments. I’ll open the bidding at 50.
…and seeing as there are female vandals involved, let’s not forget #MeToo:
It’s only fair and equitable.
Combat Controller asks why I have yet to comment on the domestic terrorist attacks in Atlanta:
Police have charged 23 people with domestic terrorism after a violent clash between police and protesters at the site of Atlanta’s future Public Safety Training Facility, nicknamed “Cop City” by critics.
Sunday night, police say the DeKalb County construction site was on lockdown as crews worked to put out flames around the area.
In total, the Atlanta Police Department said 35 “agitators” have been detained.
In Kim’s World, the word “detained” would be replaced by the phrase “shot dead”, because these little anarchist fucks are actually shooting explosives at the police, and I think that aiming anything at the police deserves a return of fire, so to speak.
What the Antifa movement really needs, I think, is a couple hundred-odd martyrs to their cause, and Atlanta would make a really good place for this process to start.
But no doubt someone will take exception to this sentiment.