So let’s get at it:
…comment from an Italian friend: “You need to boil them first.”
And on that topic: last week’s “Spank That Botty” theme was quite popular, so guess what?
MOAR BOTTY!
I know what y’all are thinking. Stop it. Go to work.
So let’s get at it:
…comment from an Italian friend: “You need to boil them first.”
And on that topic: last week’s “Spank That Botty” theme was quite popular, so guess what?
MOAR BOTTY!
I know what y’all are thinking. Stop it. Go to work.
Britishland:
Brits: “If guns are banned, can we use swords?”
Britcops: “No.”
Brits: “How about crossbows, then?”
Britcops: “We’ll get back to you on that*.”
*The Home Office has launched an eight-week consultation to see if there should be a licensing system to control the use, ownership and supply of crossbows.
The Principality of Monaco plans to follow in the footsteps of its surrounding French neighbours by organising a national day dedicated to the collection of weapons and ammunition that have been found or inherited by individuals.
At the end of 2022, France managed to collect more than 150,000 weapons without inflicting legal or administrative proceedings on the weapons’ former owners.
The head of the Administrative Police Division, Rémy Le Juste, addressed the topic at the Monaco Police’s well wishes for the New Year, saying “this is a major subject which deserves everyone’s attention, given the somewhat troubled international context that we are going through.”
Le Juste admitted that “It still happens that our services intervene with individuals who find themselves owners through inheritance of undeclared weapons dating from the Second World War,” and added: “We encourage, from now on, all people who find themselves, despite themselves, possessing weapons to call on our services: either to have them destroyed or to make them unfit for their use, and this, without these people being subject to criminal charges, subject of course to the agreement of the judicial authorities.”
Only knights, the King’s men and the king’s favorites may own weapons of war. Peasants: non.
U.S.:
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
…this time with the Son&Heir (I’m in green):
So here we go:
And speaking of smacking asses, here are a few… oh, never mind:
Finally:
Yep.
And baby, it’s going to be cold outside in Britishland:
…i.e., tomorrow:
Good luck, British people.
Here’s a headline which literally stopped me in my tracks — twice. See if you can see where:
Actress cast as Richard III? I thought casting men as women went out in the seventeenth century, but since when did casting women as men become a thing? (As an aside, how will Dickless III play the seduction of Lady Anne in Act I Scene 2 without the audience breaking into uncontrollable laughter?)
And no, by all means play the hunchbacked king as a non-impaired man, which will make the “poisonous bunch-backed toad” line (among many other such insults in the play) completely meaningless. Fucking hell; why not just play Richard III as a frog, and have done with it?
Then again, this is Britishland, home of The Bard, where I once walked out of a dreadful performance of Macbeth (at the Barbican Theatre, by the Royal Shakespeare Company) at the halfway point.
So anything’s possible. Expect to see a guest appearance by Willy Wonka or David Beckham in footballer kit during the final battle scene, where “Richard” utters the immortal line:
“A purse! A purse! My queendom for a purse!”