Not Invented Here

Once again, we have “Science!” to the rescue.  From a college professor, no less:

“I’ve often heard people argue that men’s love of breasts is just an invention of Western culture, and that there are cultures out there where breasts are no big deal to men.  It’s always struck me as implausible — could Western culture have randomly created a male obsession with women’s elbows or nostrils? I find the new study persuasive. 

“And it also strikes me as a win for common sense over an eccentric academic theory.” 

I hate to tell you this, Perfessor, but common sense almost always kicks eccentric, anti-Western, pro-feminist academic theory’s ass.  (Ask anyone in the real business world about their opinion of college-based economists.)

Anyway, back to the main topic:  men love boobs.  We like looking at them, touching them, kissing them, using them as a pillow, whatever.  ‘Twas always thus, and always will be.  And it doesn’t matter whether we are Western men or Third World tribesmen, either.

That this had to be studied at all is a mystery.  Of greater need for study is why some men prefer small boobs, and others big ‘uns.

To establish some parameters, though, here’s a representative sample.  From modest to  PHWOOAAAARRRR:

I think you get the picture(s).  Feel free to provide your scientific opinions in Comments.

Southern Women

I have mentioned before (here and here, for example) of my fondness for flirting with women, so Longtime Readers will be familiar with my attitude thereto.

Most younger women — younger than, say, fifty — are a total dead loss because they’ve been brainwashed by Teh Feministicals into believing that flirting = rape, that all men are sex maniacs/deviants, that there’s no such thing as “innocent flirting”, that a compliment about a woman’s clothing is the same thing as grabbing her boobs, and so on ad nauseam.

I have to say that in my experience, the same is not always true when it comes to Southern women, i.e. those raised in the conservative South, who seem not only to appreciate the subtle art of flirting, but who are themselves skilled practitioners of the art, bless them.

Two anecdotes should suffice.

As y’all may remember, I did the Uber-driver thing for about a year or so some time back, and because I worked the 3am-9am shift, so to speak, a large proportion of my business involved ferrying people to the Dallas-area airports.

On one such occasion, I was called to a hotel situated near Southern Methodist University (SMU), and when I got there my customer proved to be a very attractive Southern lady of about 50 with a velvety-soft Alabama accent.

“Ah need to get to th’ ayr-pawt,” she breathed softly, the sentence taking no longer than ten seconds to complete.

Because Dallas has two airports — Love Field and DFW — but SMU is just down the road from the former, I asked:  “Love?”

Without a second’s hesitation came the drawled response, “Why shuah… are yew offerin’?”

I blushed like a schoolboy, and said, “Oh man… Southern women.  Nobody can flirt like you,” and the response was a soft, delighted chuckle.

The second story happened a long time ago.

When I first arrived here, I’d got my work permit, but it turned out that the job with The Great Big Research Company could only begin about six months or so later, because Budget.  Well, one can easily starve to death in that time period, and so I took a part-time job with another research company in Las Colinas (in the Dallas area).

Among my workmates were two young women of about my age.  One was named Susan, who came from Ohio, and the other was Sherri, from East Texas.  I got on famously with both of them, but let me hasten to add that my intercourse with them was strictly social.  Then I lost touch with both when I moved up to Chicago for the GBRC job.

Several years later, I was at a conference in, I think Houston, when I bumped into both women again.  (The research world is a fairly small one.)  Unfortunately, I was preoccupied with something when I heard “Kim?” from behind me, and when I turned around I saw them standing there.

Because of the passage of the years, I couldn’t remember either of them at all, so I must have had a quizzical look on my face.  “Susan and Sherri? From Las Colinas?” one prompted.

“Oh of course, I stuttered.  Then Evil Kim came out to play.  “Forgive me, but I didn’t recognize you ladies with your clothes on.”  (When I’m embarrassed, I often do that kind of thing.)

Susan From Ohio looked shocked, even angry.  Sherri From East Texas just looked amused.

“Has it been that long?”

Southern women.  How I love them.

The Market

Here’s an interesting development in the OnlyFans business:

From Deansgate Square in the south to Collier’s Yard in the north, this is the extraordinary story of how Manchester’s new breed of ultra-luxury apartment blocks became playgrounds for a new generation of social media star.
‘This is where the magic is made,’ Jordan Smith, the 30-year-old founder of Rebel – a content creator agency – told the Mail. ‘Manchester has become a hub for creators. It’s well connected, there are investors and opportunities here. But it’s also great for creators as they can collaborate and make content with one another.’
One of Jordan’s most in-demand clients* is Harry Bourne, who strips off online under the stage name ‘Haxzy’.
‘London is more for the older generation,’ Harry tells the Mail, reclining on an armchair in his 35th-floor luxury apartment in the north west of the city. ‘Manchester is the home of the future.’
At the age of just 19, Harry has been ‘modelling’ on OnlyFans for the best part of a year. His success has been remarkable: 800 people pay £9.99 a month for his basic content. But, he assures me, ‘you won’t even get to see my “bulge” for that. Everything is extra.’  Indeed, more graphic content can cost an awful lot more. ‘I’m not one of these influencers** who will sell their whole kebab for five quid,’ Harry admits. ‘I’ll go fully naked, but only for the right money.’
It all means that Harry, who describes himself as an ‘actor***’, makes a staggering £30,000 a month – of which Rebel takes 30 per cent. ‘Other agencies**** take up to 70 per cent,’ he says, with a knowing look.  Harry is a straight man, claiming that he sleeps with up to ten different women a month. However, apart from ‘the odd female subscriber’, the majority of his audience are gay men. ‘I work about an hour a day,’ he boasts. ‘But I do stay productive. I like going out in my car, picking up birds… in my heart, I’m a good lad and I look after myself.’

Seems like it.  Here’s a quick glossary of the terms used:

*clients:  hookers
**influencers:  whores
***in the old days, “actor” (or “actress”) and “whore” meant the same thing.  Looks like we’ve regressed.
****agencies:  pimps

I am so glad I’m not part of this world.

Last Week, The Vag

…and now it’s the dick’s turn:

Oy.  My comment on this “survey” is identical to last week’s one about ladyparts.

Without bothering to read the article in question, I would hazard a guess that the size / shape / whatever of a penis has a lot less to do with the attributes thereof than does the size of the bank balance that comes with it. [sic]

But perhaps I’m being too cynical.

Bad Taste

Worst headline of the year:

FFS, was this “poll” even necessary?  I mean, I’m as lewd as the next guy, and a lot more lewd than most, and even I was offended by it.

And no, there’s no link.  You want to find it, go look for yourself at the Daily Mail.