Trying not to start the public floggings
Seen via Insty:
That would be what we call the Tacoma, Over Here:
Just wondering whether the roof struts are strong enough to handle the mount… not that I’m thinking of doing anything revolutionary, of course.
Sadly, New Wife is not of the Pickup Truck Persuasion, and point-blank refuses to let me get one when it comes time to trade in the Tiguan.
Too bad; I rather fancied this version:
From Max Morton at American Greatness [irony alert] :
On one hand, you have traditional Americans. They come in every race, creed, and religion. They believe in law and order, expect everyone to follow the rules, and mostly just want to be left alone.
Family-oriented, self-reliant, and armed, traditional Americans populate the working-class ranks of the military, law enforcement, and industry. Sadly, most are technically illiterate. They underestimate the threat from the surveillance state and Securitate. Many still believe the FBI only goes after bad guys, and they cannot grasp that the national security apparatus now views them as the enemy. They rightly bristle when slandered with “white supremacist” or “terrorist” labels. A habituated trust in authority makes them vulnerable to snitching on others and collaborating with those they shouldn’t. Many are infected with white knight conspiracy theories that counsel remaining submissive. In general, they have nearly zero control of the nation’s money, media, government, academia, legal system, and surveillance state.On the other hand is the ruling elite. They advocate a multi-tiered justice system and expect others to follow their rules, beliefs, and norms. They are politically savvy and disciplined. They view traditional Americans and their beliefs as an impediment to their wealth and utopian dreams, going so far as routinely to advocate extreme actions such as genocide, re-education, and the removal of the children of their political opposition.
They employ proxy forces, such as Antifa, Black Lives Matter, and journalists to bully ordinary Americans and weak-willed corporations. In order to intimidate and discredit their political opposition, they’ve weaponized the use of labels such as “white supremacist” and “terrorist” on their enemies. They are generally opposed to religion and personal firearm ownership, and they cannot allow you to be left alone. They will attempt to nudge wrong-thinkers into accepting the ruling elite’s ideology. If that doesn’t work, they’ll force compliance via law enforcement, military, and the intelligence agencies they now command. They control most of the national wealth and all of the media, government, academia, legal authorities, and surveillance state.
Not much I can add to that. For various options for us to combat the above, read the rest of the article.
Be warned: much of that is not only difficult, but beyond the reach of average Americans like me.
Via GatewayPundit comes this survey result:
And what I think this means is that’s the Trump who got the Arabs and Izzies to talk nice to each other, who started to build a wall on our southern border, who got corporations to pull back from China, who lowered taxes, who got Keystone XL going, who caused the economy to boom, energized crowds and all that. The Trump we’re not interested in is the poltroon who shot his mouth off on Twatter, let his mouth run away from him in important speeches and allowed the Left to demonize and attack him.
So just as a thought exercise, and realizing that it’s four years till the next election where we get to toss Kamala Harris out of the Oval Office, let’s talk about this a little. I think we should forget about Trump ever running (or for that matter winning) for POTUS again. For one thing, he’ll be too old in 2020 and for another, I think that while he showed the way, his race is run. Time to move on.
I know it’s way premature and others may arise in years to come, but as I see it, the politicians who right now seem to be most like Trump (and without all those annoying little ego quirks) are as follows, in no specific order:
“Establishment” candidates:
Ron DeSantis (FloridaGov). My Floriduh Readers may be able to shed a little more light on DeSantis, but from what I’ve seen so far, with the proper grooming he could be Trump’s heir apparent. Most tellingly, from the depth and viciousness of the Left’s attacks on him right now, I think they see him as a dangerous opponent. I prefer my presidents to have executive experience (unlike, say, Obama) in politics or even in business (like Trump), and DeSantis has that.
Mike Pompeo (ex-SecState and CIA Director under Trump). Brilliant foreign policy formulator, always has America’s interests at heart, no-nonsense attitude, and has Congressional experience as a former Congressman.
Kristi Noem (SDGov). I think I’d prefer to see her as the VP, simply because running a tiny state like South Dakota isn’t comparable to the same job in Texas or Florida. But she’s strong on values (conservative values) and she was also in Congress so she’ll know how that snakepit functions.
Richard Grenell (former ambassador and acting head of DNI). I like this man’s attitude and my only concern is that he has had no executive experience — but I think he’d be a real quick learner. I understand that if CalGov Newsom is recalled (I wish), Grenell wants to run against him in the follow-up election, and if he wins and gets any kind of success in pulling California away from the pit, he’d be a really string contender in 2024.
Rick Scott (R-FL senator and ex-FLGov). On paper, he has it all: executive experience in business and government, strong conservative credentials and he understands how Congress works. He’s now 68 and would be 72 in 2024, if that matters.
Scott Walker (ex-WIGov). He gets up the Left’s collective nose, and has actually had good conservative results despite rabid opposition from the Commies. Also has executive experience, and is a full-blown Midwesterner.
Mike Pence (ex-VP under Trump, ex-INGov and congressman). I think that Pence has the character aspect sewn up, and none of the Left’s attacks on him have worked. Ordinarily, the VP is the heir apparent, but he’s definitely not Trump II — which is both good and bad. He certainly has all the experience anyone could bring to the table. Under any other president than Trump, Pence would be a shoo-in for the next election. He still might be.
“Wild Card” candidate:
Dan Crenshaw (R-TX congressman, ex-SEAL Team 3). He looks like a pirate, has few if any equals in terms of military cred, and his no-bullshit attitude is better than Trump’s. He has little executive experience other than in the military. Definitely a long-term prospect.
I don’t care about any of the associated characteristics of the above (DeSantis is Hispanic, Grenell is a homo, Noem has a vagina etc.) because none of that matters. What matters is the next Republican candidate’s closeness to Trumpist philosophy and governing style (minus, as I said, the silly tweets and non-Presidential extemporaneous remarks).
As always, your comments and suggestions are welcome.
Let’s hear it again for that wonderful thing called “diversity”:
Racist Aldi customer yells in female worker’s face that ‘everywhere I move there are fucking Eastern Europeans’ in xenophobic rant.
Okay, a couple of points. A British man shouting at an Eastern European woman isn’t “racist”, any more than an Israeli shouting abuse at an Arab is racist — both groups are genetically identical, the Brit to the European, the Israeli to the Arab.
That being out of the way, let’s look at the larger issue.
The only thing the newspaper headline got right is that the tirade was xenophobic.
And what, I ask, is that wrong with xenophobia (literally, a fear of strangers, now magically transformed into a hatred towards strangers)?
Here’s the thing. When you grow up in an ethnically-homogenous society, it is an inherent human trait to be suspicious of strangers, for all sorts of historical reasons which go back so far they’ve become genetic — countless millennia of social conditioning have seen to that. It’s precisely the same impulse which gets parents to teach their children not to get into the red van with a stranger. Outsiders, as any respectable anthropologist or Old Western sheriff will tell you, are potentially dangerous because they have no roots in the community, and often have values and morals which are completely different from (and in some cases are hostile towards) a settled community’s values. (And for a reality check: immigrants all over the world engage in criminal behavior out of all proportion to their actual numbers.)
Oh I know, in these modern oh-so tolerant and accepting (ha!) times, we should seek to deny our human nature because it’s eeeevil and diversity is wonderful and all that. The “melting pot theory” fantasists are completely wedded to that concept, even though both history and the human condition have proven that it is complete bullshit. The plain fact of the matter is that if foreigners are to come into a settled community which is ethnically and socially different to theirs, they are the ones who need to assimilate, to make the effort to submerge themselves into the dominant culture — it’s not up to the locals to accommodate them, even though you’re still going to find those irritating “Habla Español” signs everywhere. (That, by the way, is a courtesy and not an obligation, although many would say it’s the latter.)
I’m acutely aware of this, of course, because I myself am an immigrant and still speak with something of a South African accent after nearly forty years’ residence in my beloved adopted country. (Blame my vocal cords, which had stiffened beyond adaptability by the time I got here in my early 30s.) But culturally, I defy anyone, native-born or naturalized, to be more American than I am because when I came here, I was determined to become an American and not remain some malcontent foreigner forever rooted in my home country.
This is not always the case with immigrants, though, and that is why people like that Brit in the article let loose: he had reached the limits of his xeno-tolerance. Race had nothing at all to do with it.
Here’s the final word. In one of those little exquisite twists of irony, the Aldi supermarket chain is actually of German origin. But when you step into an Aldi store here and in Britain, all the signs are in English, not German; and the currency is local and not euros. And while Aldi often hires non-locals, that’s an economic rationale because immigrants are prepared to work for lower wages than locals, and Aldi’s marketing policy is to be the low-price retailer in town. But even this approach is fraught with hazard:
“You can ban me from every Aldi in the fucking world, the sooner this fucking store is shut down and kicked out the fucking UK the better.”
I bet he’s not the only bloke in town who feels that way.
…or, as George H.W. Bush used to say: “Nah gunna do it.”
Once again, we are being implored to stop fighting among ourselves, with words such as:
There is much talk today about the splits in the Republican Party, though similar rifts plague the Democrats. But the sharpest, deepest divide remains between the two parties. Rarely in recent memory has it been so clear. Rarely has there been less of a center. Republicans must focus all their energy on regaining the majority in Congress.
Tell you what: I’ll stop fighting with the GOPe / “centrist” Republicans when they stop acting as facilitators to the Socialists by “compromising” — i.e. yielding to the Socialists’ demands — when the Socialists seldom if ever make any concessions away from their Marxist agenda.
The Republicans’ most stunning success in recent years has been when conservatives act like, well, conservatives — ask Hillary Clinton — so the real concessions that the GOPe should be making are to us, the so-called “Trumpists*”, and not to the Marxists.
*The very next time a Republican refers derisively to a conservative as a “Trumpist”, I’m gonna give them a ball-kicking (or cunt-punt, depending on circumstances). Leave the name-calling to the Marxists.
Guns are white supremacy’s deadliest weapon. We must disarm hate.
Oh, really. And who are these “white supremacists”, and who gets to identify them? Well, the answer to the first is easy: that would be “anyone who disagrees with my opinions” — uttered by any politician of the Socialist persuasion — and such disagreement is ipso facto a definition of a white supremacist.
Got that? Now read on to discover the primary identifier:
This deadly connection between white supremacy and guns runs throughout our history. In 1866, armed Confederate loyalists stormed the Louisiana Constitutional Convention, murdering 34 Black Americans in an attempt to block suffrage for freed slaves. In 1898, an armed White mob in Wilmington, N.C., proclaimed a “White Declaration of Independence,” then killed at least 60 residents before replacing the multiracial local government with white supremacists. In 1921, mobs of armed White residents of Tulsa attacked the Black neighborhood of Greenwood, murdering as many as 300 Tulsans for the crime of being Black and successful.
The commonality of all the above? Why, it should be obvious:
That’s right: all white supremacists have BOOBS !!!!!
(I’m just trying to follow this reporter’s logic, here.)
Okay, maybe that’s not what she was talking about. What could she be talking about? From the article itself:
Oh, okay.
So in the interest of racial comity, I’m calling on all women to throw off their Confederate bikinis. Pics (or preferably videos) can be sent to me for verification.