Some guy has put together a video of the Best-Shooting Pistols. Frankly, I’ll take his word for it, because I do not ever want to get into a gunfight with him. Watch the video to see why.
This, folks, is why one needs to practice a lot — although I will admit that having a little gun range in one’s backyard (as he does) without any discernible neighbors in the area doesn’t hurt. If I had one of those, I’d be the world’s best .22 rifle shooter (and have the world’s largest collection of .22 rifles with burnt-out barrels).
After watching the video a couple-three times, I came to realize two things: 1) I have got to shoot more often, and 2) I need to look at the CZ Shadow 2. (Forget about the STI; I can’t even afford the “base” model Staccato P.)
Hell, at least I have a High Power. Now all I have to do is ahem practice a bit more.
What I haven’t talked much about was one of the extra-curricular activities called “cadets”. This was a military course: close-order drill, full dress uniforms and discipline. It took place once a week during school hours, and would involve getting dressed into uniform before school started, then breaking from class, going to the armory, drawing our drill rifles (decommissioned SMLEs), then running in formation down the stairs you see in the above pic, and drilling on the “A” rugby field. (pic is not of us, but another school)
At the end of the drill period, we would run back up the stairs to the school and to our houses, where we showered, changed back into school uniform and continued with regular classes.
Of course, discipline was harsh because private school duh (to the point where most private schoolboys, once drafted, would find actual Army boot camp not too onerous). “Defaulters” was feared — boots not shiny enough? uniform not pressed? not drilling properly? late for parade? etc. — and Defaulters involved one hour after school or on Saturday morning spent running up and down said stairs (two hundred and twenty-seven, ask me how I know this), carrying the aforesaid rifles overhead and shouting “Coll-ege! Coll-ege!”
Secretly, I loved cadets. I loved the polishing of my boots (to where you could tell the time in their toecaps’ reflection), I loved the precision of the drill, I liked the camaraderie of the shared misery with my buddies; but most of all, I loved Musketry.
Once a week, instead of drawing SMLEs, one lucky platoon would draw BSA-Martini falling-block single-shot .22 rifles from the armory and head off to the 50-yard shooting range for an hour and a half of target shooting. Here’s the rifle we used:
…the rear aperture sights requiring adjustment (“side screw one click, top screw two clicks”) as we shot. (The range master was a U.S. Marine Corps Korean veteran from Georgia, a.k.a. the school chaplain.) We shot from prone, unsupported (“no dead-resting!”) and the greatest disappointment of the day was the final “Cease Fire! Cease Fire!” command, delivered in Fr. Fitzhugh’s stentorian bellow (“Sayce Fahr!” was what it actually sounded like).
With my old and decrepit eyes, I probably couldn’t shoot this vintage thing for peanuts these days, but despite that I would head off to Collectors and get this beauty in a heartbeat, if I had the spare dollars.
Following my post about the Brno ZKM-611, Reader JohnF asks in an email: “The 611 is a non-starter because it’s so expensive. If you like CZ’s semi-auto rimfire rifles so much, why not just go for the newer 512 model?” (I should add, for those who don’t know, that CZ eliminated the “Brno” brand, but the CZ/Brno labels are essentially the same gun, e.g. Brno 602 = CZ 550 Safari.)
Good question. Here’s a look back at the 611, followed by the 512 (both in .22 WinMag):
Fact is, if I were looking to buy a semi-auto .22 WinMag rifle, I’d give the CZ 512 a long, hard look simply because it’s a CZ. But if I wanted to add a beautiful rifle to my meager collection, gimme the Brno any day of the week. Is the 611 hundreds of dollars better than its successor? Nope, but that’s not the question.
And the 611 is a takedown rifle, whereas the 512 isn’t. That feature also points to the ZKM-611 as the better choice.
Digression:
I should also point out that new semi-auto .22 WinMag rifles other than the CZ 512 are like hen’s teeth, simply because Ruger stopped making their 10/22M line, the idiots. Apparently they claimed unsolvable feeding issues for the decision, but I never had that problem, not once. I wish I’d never sold mine.
As far as I can see, the only other manufacturer currently making a .22 WinMag semi-auto rifle is Savage, with their A22 Magnum. Predictably, being Savage, it’s pig-ugly:
But on the other hand, the A22 features Savage’s excellent Accu-Trigger, so it should be a worthy alternative to the CZ 512. (I’ve never fired the A22 before, so I can’t say.) Savage also claims to have fixed the .22 WinMag’s alleged feeding problem by making it a delayed blowback action. Typically, the A22 sells for just over $400 as I write this, compared to the CZ 512’s $500+ (although it’s discounted by $100 at Cabela’s).
And here’s a side-by-side comparison of the two. The CZ 512 wins, hands down, in just about every department. Clearly, the $100 premium is worth it.
One of the things I hate about rifle practice is the inability to see clearly the bullet strikes on the target (unless using expensive Shoot-N-C targets) — and even more, scanning / photographing and recording the results for, say, posting here. Step forward, this neat item:
Features
300 yard range
High Definition at 960P
Adjustable Wi-Fi transmitter
Built-in, locking cantilever
Cantilever has 90º tilt-n-lock, and rotation for line of sight
Wi-Fi transmitter LED indicator for power and signal strength
Easy on/off switch
Wi-Fi independent charging system
1/4″ standard camera tripod mount (tripod not included)
Built-in camera sun-shade
LED illumination for low light conditions
Flip up telescoping legs for angled use 15º to 25º
Base has serrated gripping feet for level use
Weather resistant construction
Green identifying highlights
Note Download the free Bullseye Target Manager App to your mobile device (available on GooglePlay or Apple App Store) to seamlessly pair to the Target Camera System on-board Wi-Fi to view shot placement in real time!
I don’t have the two hundred bucks spare to buy this thing right now, but others might. (And there are longer-range ones also available at Midway.)
Anyone know anything about this particular gizmo?
(Standard disclaimer: I don’t get any compensation, cash or otherwise, for doing stuff like this — damn it.)
Back in the days of yore (when I still lived in Seffrica that is), I had occasion to rent a cottage in what was then bush country, somewhere between Johannesburg and Pretoria. While sorta-developed, the area still had dirt roads, and the property sizes were of a type called a “smallholding” — anywhere from five to twenty-five acres, as memory serves. It looked something like this:
…and yes, people still rode horses around, either for recreation or to go shopping for groceries and such at the little general dealer on the main road.
The problem with living out there, as anyone who’s done it can attest, is that the place is alive with critters — even though you’re thirty or so miles away from Johannesburg and a little more from Pretoria, Africa can turn from city to bush very quickly in terms of its wildlife. (I remember a leopard once being trapped in the Wanderers Cricket Ground, which would be like finding a mountain lion in the Rose Bowl stadium in Pasadena.)
So on the far outskirts of Kyalami (just south of the Formula 1 track, as it happens), a night-time drive along the dirt roads would often reveal anonymous glowing eyes in the darkness on either side, and only in the next day’s light could you see in the dirt the tracks of jackals, rabbits and so on, but especially the former. Jackals (larger than foxes but smaller than coyotes) were a particular pest, and while usually solitary scavengers, sometimes also hunted in small family groups.
And while skittish about humans, that didn’t stop them from preying on other small animals like, say, household pets, which they regarded pretty much as candy, and they would wreak havoc in the chicken coops, of which there were many in the area. Only large farm dogs like ridgebacks or boerboels were more or less safe…
…unless, of course, the jackal had rabies (very common) in which case nothing was safe. Shooting them, in other words, was very much a public service at that time and in that area.
So of an evening I would sometimes sit on the little front porch of my cottage armed with a six-pack of Castle Lager, a lantern and my faithful old .22 Winchester Model 63, and shoot at them as they scampered through the fence and onto the property. (I should add that the ground sloped down towards a stream called the Jukskei River, the trees and dense bushes forming an impenetrable backstop at the property line.)
The only problem with hunting in Africa is that the animals are tough as nails, and no matter what caliber you’re using, it never seems to be quite enough. And this was the case with jackals and the .22 LR. Unless you got a heart shot (and a jackal’s heart is not large), all you’d end up with was a yelp and a puff of dust. Shit. Now to track a wounded animal through tall veld grass, in the dark, across a stream and over property fences into the neighbors’ plots of land, which were guarded by the aforementioned ridgebacks and boerboels.
Not an optimal situation, I think we can all agree.
Then on a business trip to Bloemfontein down in the Orange Free State, I was sitting having a sundowner with a client in his office one evening. He was an older man, an Afrikaner who’d grown up on a farm; and when the subject turned to shooting, as it often did with him, he just shook his head when I told him about shooting jackals with a .22 LR.
“Use a .22 Magnum,” was his advice.
So the next day I stopped in at a gun store in downtown Bloemfontein on my way to the airport and looked for something in .22 WinMag. And there it was, on pegs just behind the counter, an exact replica of this Brno 611 semi-auto.
And it had been sold only a half-hour before I walked into the store. (Back then in Seffrica, there was a waiting period while your license application was being processed by the police, so you had to leave the gun behind in the store.)
Shit shit shit.
I’ve had occasion to shoot the Brno 611 several times since then, and to this day I’ve always wanted one. Only the nosebleed prices thereof have stopped me — and the magazines are almost as costly as the damn guns themselves, because CZ stopped making them many years ago. The one in the pic is at Collectors, and runs for just over a grand. If you have a spare G lying around, treat yourself to this beauty for Christmas. And by the way, it’s a takedown:
…so you can carry it in your truck as an almost-ready-to-go varmint killer.
And should you have buyer’s remorse — you shouldn’t, but hey — console yourself that you still have the perfect rifle for hunting the South African black-backed jackal.
Postscript: the area I described in the above tale is now a bunch of housing developments, office buildings and a fucking golf course.
We all know that the eeeevil Black Assault Rifle AR-15 is doubleplusungood because it’s an Implement Of War and Shouldn’t Be In The Hands Of Civilians etc. etc. because it, well, it just looks scawwwy and stuff.
I mean, here’s the proof and everything that it’s a Weapon Of War etc.:
However (and this is the simple question): what if the Evil Black Rifle in the first picture is actually chambered not for the death-dealing tumbling-bullet military poodleshooter 5.56mm NATO, but for the little .22 Long Rifle cartridge instead?
Should this gun be BANNNNNED as well, just because it looks so terrifying and stuff?