Not just the guns, but all the stuff that goes with them
Email from National Treasure Joe Huffman, concerning The Great Gun Robbery:
That really sucks.
I have moved your entry to next year. Same position, etc.
The event will probably be April 29th -> May 1st.Joe Huffman
Boomershoot Event Director
For me, Boomershoot is becoming like the Jews’ mantra: “Next year in Jerusalem Orofino.”
Yesterday I went over to our (still-being-rebuilt) apartment. Not having any room in our tiny hotel room, on Wednesday I’d taken all the Boomershoot stuff and stored it in our (locked) garage, to be loaded into the rental SUV for the trip up to Idaho on Monday (tomorrow).
On Friday night, the garage was burgled and all the guns and related stuff stolen.
Rifle #1: CZ 557 Varmint (.308 Win)
Scope #1: Vortex Viper HS-T
Rifle #2: CZ 550 American (6.5x55mm)
Scope #2: Meopta Optika6 Illuminated (4.5-30x50mm)
Revolver: Ruger Single Six (.22LR/.22Mag)
Also, a double-rifle hard case and two range bags.
And, of course, about a thousand rounds of .308 and 6.5x55mm ammo, all helpfully loaded into ammo cans, and a few dozen rounds of .45, .22 and 9mm (in the range bags). Amazingly, a pair of expensive Steiner binoculars were tossed aside (!).
Total value of the stolen goods: just under $6,000.
All our brand new replacement furniture, and electronics (TV, computer etc.) and all my tools (!) were untouched. They were after the guns. (Thank gawd I’d already moved all my other guns over to Doc Russia’s place, or else I’d be in even more trouble.)
According to the Plano PD (yeah, I have a case # and everything), there were no fingerprints left, which points to a pro job. There is a pretty substantial group of suspects — this was not a case of a couple guys walking past and deciding that this looked like a likely place to burgle — but I’ll leave that to the cops to figure out. They have the list.
What this means:
1.) I’ve had to cancel Boomershoot this year — no point in going, no guns to shoot, no ammo, nada. I’ve already canceled the rental SUV and hotel accommodation. So we’re all clear on this: I am spitting angry, but most of all I am embarrassed because many of you kind folks sent me money, not only for the drawing but to help with the costs of associated purchases for the trip — several items of which have already been bought. Aaargh. Nevertheless, if you are one of those people who specified that the money was for expenses, email me and I will refund you your money. (Almost all the paper records I have were being kept — where else? in one of the missing range bags — so I have no clue what the total amount is; but I’ll trust in your honesty.)
2.) When the insurance company reimburses me for the guns (less my $500 co-pay of course), I’ll replace the CZ 557 and scope, and hold the lottery for that rig then. I don’t know how long it will take for them to do this, most likely a few months. Please be patient with me while I speak to the insurance company over the next few days.
3.) I have no idea whether the guns will ever be recovered.
Fuck.
Via Insty, I see this little piece on people not falling for the Socialists’ gun panic pronouncements and concomitant bullshit anti-gun legislation:
Despite the overwhelming rhetoric machine that the anti-2A people have, a new poll shows that the American public’s taste for new and stricter laws has dropped a bit.
However, what caught my eye was the accompanying pic (from Oregon):
…AND it’s apparently a recent pic.
They must be having fewer gun purchases in Salem, OR — because here in Cuidad Tejas, a stockholding such as that would be cleared out in about 20 minutes on any given Saturday.
They probably have ammo too, the lucky bastards.
Yesterday we got news that our apartment is nearly finished, having had to be rebuilt from the studs up following that burst water main during the Big Freeze back in February.
Yes, we’ve been living in a hotel room since then. But now, there’s light at the end of the tunnel, so to speak, and we’ll be able to move back into our place over the next week or so…
…which is when I’ll be at Boomershoot.
Think kind thoughts and say a few good words for New Wife, as she struggles to rebuild the nest without me.
But before anyone gets any strange ideas, you have to know this about her: she lives for this kind of thing, and I don’t. In fact, I am the worst possible person during a move: I rage at stuff, I slam fingers in doors, I drop boxes, I kick stuff, I throw things into the pool out of frustration — all that, because of one of my life’s guiding principles:
I refuse to take any shit from inanimate objects.
She, however, is the complete opposite: nothing makes her happier than organizing stuff. So she’s going to be puttering around, re-packing kitchen cabinets, hanging clothes, singing happy songs and bossing the movers around — yes, I’ll be arranging for a moving company to move all the heavy stuff from the garage back into the apartment (a distance of a few feet only, but there are doors to wrangle the sofas and beds through — and when they don’t go, that’s precisely when I see red, descend into rage and start to break things).
Had I not invested so much into Boomershoot already, I’d have canceled it — but it’s too late for that at this point, so there it is.
You know, when I talk about a gun that has taken my fancy (e.g. the gorgeous S&W Model 25 of last Friday), that doesn’t mean I think it’s the only good gun, nor even the best gun; it just caught my eye and I felt like talking about it.
So when I drooled over the Model 25 (and 625), that didn’t mean I was ignoring others of the ilk, nor even saying ugly things about them.
Such is not the case among my Readers, yea even unto the Comments. Saith Reader MPW250:
“Sorry, but being raised by one of the few (at the time) Colt New Service collectors, I have to disagree and go with a New Service in plain or Flat Top Target configuration.”
I know all about the New Service line — hell, back in the old Racist Republic, I used to carry a modified 1917 (shortened barrel, adapted to use moonclipped .45 ACP):
…because .45 Colt ammo was nowhere to be found in South Africa at the time, but .45 ACP was plentiful.
So don’t think I’m being dismissive of the Colt DA revolvers just because I was talking about Smiths.
And then there are the legions of Ruger devotees, such as Reader MikeL, who sent this to my email addy:
I have to disagree slightly on your choice of 45 revolver.
The model 25 is nice. Don’t get me wrong. However in addition to me being a much bigger fan of Ruger over Smith & Wesson – there is another factor.
The Ruger Redhawk 45. With the Redhawk you can not only chamber 45 ACP (using moon clips of course) but also 45 Long Colt.
This gives you a versatile tool.
Also with Ruger, according to Buffalo Bore Ammo, Ruger RedHawks can handle stout ammo. The Plus P 45 long colt approaches entry level 44 Mag level power.
And for those days when softer recoil is needed – 45 ACP or regular 45 Long Colt ammo types will do just fine.
Again: I have nothing repeat nothing bad to say about the Redhawk — as with the 1917 above, I’ve actually owned one (albeit in the .45 LC-only version):
…and I loved the thing.
But (and I cannot stress this too strongly) on the day during which my gaze fell upon the S&W Mod 25 at Collectors, I didn’t see whether there were any Colt New Service revolvers, nor Ruger Redhawks either: because I wasn’t looking for them.
So please: when I drool over a gun, don’t think I’m making a comparison — unless I actually make a comparison (as I did between the two rifles chambered in 7.62x39mm last Saturday). I know there are always different options, but let me rave on in peace.
As part of my desire to pull back from longer-distance shooting — perhaps “desire” is the wrong word; “forced by crap eyesight” is longer, but more accurate — comes the need to look at a rifle which would suit my purpose better than those I already have. Here’s one such example of a gun currently sitting in Ye Olde Gunne Sayfe, a CZ 550 (6.5x55mm Swede), topped with a Meopta 6-24x56mm scope:
As any fule Longtime Reader kno, I love me my 6.5×55 Swede cartridge, and I love equally the gorgeous CZ 550 Mauser rifle with its sweeeeet single set trigger. To replace this beauty would require ripping out a piece of my heart; but, at the same time, it has become too much rifle and honestly, would better suit someone who could actually use it to its full potential. I’m not that person, anymore.
But if I were going to replace this paragon of excellence, the new bolt-action rifle would need to fill several criteria: reliable, accurate, and chambered for a cartridge which would not require me to spend almost as much on new ammo as on the rifle and scope. Something like the 7.62x39mm Russian (of which I have a ummm modest supply already in Ye Olde Ammoe Locquer).
There aren’t too many of these extant, but here are a couple, with their comparative features side by side:
Given my long and affectionate relationship with CZ rifles, one would think that the 527 would have the inside track; but I have to tell you, that stubby little bull barrel of the Ruger looks very tempting. I’m not too concerned about the difference in barrel length, because as it is, the 7.62x39mm works just fine in an AK’s 16.5″ barrel, and the shorter barrel would make the Ruger less unwieldy.
And I know that the Ruger’s standard trigger isn’t as good as the 527’s set trigger, but given the price disparity between them, a drop-in Timney (about $150) would still bring the Ranch Rifle’s price in below that of the CZ 527, and if I set it to a sensible 2.5lb pull, that would be more than adequate.
I hate the Ruger’s plastic stock material — or is it a painted laminate? either way, it’s awful — and of course the CZ’s walnut is exquisite by comparison, albeit somewhat heavier.
As for glass: the 24x Meopta is much more than I need when my likely (and preferred) shooting distance would be somewhat around (and probably less than) 200 yards. Something smaller (and lighter, as a bonus) would work just as well on either rifle, and I’d be looking at something like a Leupold 3-9x40mm 3HD, a Leupold 2-10x42mm VX-5HD, or else the Minox 2-10×50 ZX5i (all with illuminated reticles, to help my pathetic eyesight):
I have a long and satisfying association with both Leupold and Minox scopes too, so this would not be short-changing myself at all.
One more thing: I’m not a huge fan of rail scope mounts such as on the Ruger, because they do raise the scope high off the action. Low scope bases (lower even than on the CZ 500 pictured) would definitely work better for me.
As I said earlier, all the above is certainly food for thought, and I will be considering the whole thing carefully for a while before I drop the hammer, so to speak. I hate selling guns, but if I’m replacing one that I can’t shoot properly for one that I can, it does make the process easier.