For some time now, I’ve been hankering after a six-shooter — for no reason other than the usual — and I’ve gotta say, this offering is pretty tasty:
You can get a decent .45 LC revolver for half that, but nowhere near as pretty.
Not just the guns, but all the stuff that goes with them
For some time now, I’ve been hankering after a six-shooter — for no reason other than the usual — and I’ve gotta say, this offering is pretty tasty:
You can get a decent .45 LC revolver for half that, but nowhere near as pretty.
Cops raid some bad guys’ place, find this:
Of course, this will have to be banned because of all those drive-by chainsaw massacres.
I can’t help thinking that this beast is mainly for intimidation purposes — not to mention that the carrier needs to be fairly muscular just to carry it around.
That said, in the hands of law enforcement, I can’t help but think that it would be a decent riot repellent — although a simple bayonet would have pretty much the same effect.
Had occasion to go over to my local Merchant O’ Death yesterday, just to browse a little and to tickle my fancy by looking at a couple of guns I’ve been eyeing out lately. Well…
The handgun counter is usually crammed with guns — well over a hundred, as I recall — and the few guns you see under the glass are either the very expensive (Nighthawk, etc.) or else .22 pistols and single-action revolvers.
Ditto the rifle racks: the nearly-empty one on the left is usually packed with AR-15s and AKs… not anymore. The rack on the right has sporting shotguns, mostly, and even those have been moving out — bought by people who, when they find all their first- and second choices out of stock, are buying double-barreled shotguns just to have something on hand.
The guys tell me that they have over six hundred guns on order, but the distributors are looking after the bigger dealers first, so little establishments like this one are in a desert. Even then: “Have you been to Cabela’s or Bass Pro recently? They’re almost as bad as we are.”
When I think of all the work I’ve done over the years to try and make America a Nation of Riflemen again… and all it took was a few riots in Minneapolis and Seattle to do just that.
Finally — finally! — I was able to get to the range yesterday, and I think the sighting-in is almost complete. Good grief, it’s been so long (thank you, Chinkvirus), that I probably need to remind y’all what the heck I’m talking about (link):
Here’s the target, at 100 yards:
That was with El Cheapo (Prvi Partizan) ammo. LOL on me, by the way: in the five-shot group, the bottom three were the first fired; then I adjusted the scope and fired off two (the top two that are almost touching) — only I adjusted the scope UP instead of DOWN because Idiot Kim. Finally got it more or less right, although I’m peeved that none of the final three were touching.
Next week, I’ll try a couple different makes over two or more range sessions, see which one works best, and then hold the drawing next weekend. Which means the Hawkeye should be on its way to its new owner around August 20.
Good luck to you all.
My first-ever carry gun back in the 1970s was actually an inherited Baby Browning (.25 ACP, about the same as a .22 Mag in effectiveness), and I have to tell you, I never carried it with any confidence.
That youthful feeling of skepticism has carried over into my later years, with a vengeance.
This article here gives all the reason why I don’t carry a “pocket gun”. Here’s my summary of reasons:
Mostly, the caliber choices are inadequate (.380 ACP is marginally effective, but only with super-premium cartridges like Hornady or the like), and if you do carry a beefier chambering, the gun is well-nigh uncontrollable. Newton’s law will not be denied.
I have fairly big hands, and shooting a Ruger LCP / Kel-Tec P3AT-type is frankly a real hassle for me.
I find it easier, in fact, to shoot a micro-handgun like the NAA Mini-revolver (which I do carry, loaded with .22 Mag snake shot cartridges but only when I’m in, um, snake country).
(And I have the oversized rubber grips on mine [see below], to make it more controllable.)
Here’s my take on this whole issue. The common rationale for carrying one of these peashooters is that it’s better than carrying no gun at all. Maybe that’s true, but I think it’s more likely not true — accuracy (in almost any chambering) is problematic, which leads to the counter-argument that these are really “under the chin” guns (or as I call it, “halitosis range”). Quite frankly, though, I’m not comfortable with getting that close to a goblin — hell, if you’re going to be in kissing distance, a decent fucking knife is the equal of any of these peashooters, and I’m too old to be getting into knife fights or, for that matter, grappling with some asshole who’s forty years younger than I am while I struggle to put a bullet into his eye, throat or belly.
No, thank you. My sole concession to carrying a smaller gun is my S&W 637 Airweight, and to be frank, I feel undergunned when I head out on a pizza run (the most common reason to take “any” gun when leaving the house).
Here are my primary carry choices:
Not pictured: Browning High Power. Still to come (from): a Colt Python, S&W 66 / 627 / 686, Ruger GP100, Kimber K6 and maybe a couple others.
I have no plans — none — to buy a pocket anything except a watch. But that’s a story for another time…
A comment to an earlier post about sissy guns got me thinking about the above headline:
“I’m with Kim. I don’t understand what Sig is trying to do with this gun. It’s like when Kimber came out with the Bel Air Micro.”
I had never heard of the Kimber Bel Air, so I looked it up. Great Vulcan’s bleeding hemorrhoids.
The only thing I like about this gun is the Novak sight setup. I think I’ll buy Daughter one for her birthday, because it has to be better than the Taurus thing she’s carrying at the moment.
And she’s never going to get rid of her Buck Mark:
Just looking at all those girly guns makes my breasts start to grow…
I need to top up the old Testosterone Tank, so if you’ll excuse me, I’m off to the range.