Splendid Isolation

Quote Of The Day

March 25, 2025 Kim du Toit LGBTOSTFU, QOTD

From John Nolte:

“A public that had come to sympathize with the bigotry and treatment of homosexuals no longer feels that same goodwill. After all, we were told that gay people just wanted to be left alone, to be allowed to live and let live. That turned out to be a big, fat lie. In about six seconds we went from, How does my same-sex marriage affect you, to openly targeting little kids with grooming, gay porn in elementary schools, drag queens reading to kids, boys playing in girls’ sports, men barging into women’s bathrooms and locker rooms, and this monstrous push to permanently mutilate children as sacrifices to the trans gods.”

Phrases such as “camel’s nose”, “thin end of the wedge” and “slippery slope” come to mind.

News Roundup

March 25, 2025 Kim du Toit Bad News

And some political news snips:

In :

...drill baby, drill.
#YeahWeVotedForThis

Some Political News:

...wait: Fatboi? The poster child for “limousine socialist”?

And now for some good lovin’ (I just love it when the girls talk and act tough):

…

And speaking of “love”:

...Rosie O’Donnell, Ellen Degenerate, and now Courtney… still more reasons to support DJT.

And speaking of unwelcome immigrants, in The Great Cultural Assimilation Project©:

...and it’s a socialist country, even. While locally:

...except that he isn’t a “student”, but a fucking lecturer.

...see? That wasn’t so difficult, wuzzit?

In Global Cooling Climate Warming Change© News:

...did somebody say: “Party time!” ?

Why, I believe they did.

From the Dept. of Education:

...is it so wrong that I got mildly excited by this visual?

...redefining the term “special ed”. And speaking of rapists:

...of course he does.
#Britishland

In Entertainment News:

...careful what you wish for, Jew-hate boy; you know she has Armenian cousins, right?

Now, the always-popular

...uh-huh, uh-huh.

From the front-line trenches in Sex Wars:

...not to mention poverty. Even so, you’d still have get me to pull my lips off Salma Hayek’s at gunpoint.

…and at that familiar address on :

...don’t we all, honey, don’t we all. Here’s hers, back then:

…although I must say, the 58-year-old bod isn’t too horrible either:

“Fine wine” comes to mind.

And that’s probably about as much news as anyone can bare.

Food For Thought

March 24, 2025 Kim du Toit Deep Thoughts

From Surber The Great:

ITEM 24: Resist the Mainstream reported, “Federal prosecutors have charged three individuals with carrying out violent attacks against Tesla properties, describing their actions as acts of domestic terrorism. The suspects allegedly used Molotov cocktails to set fire to Tesla dealerships, vehicles and charging stations in multiple states.”

Look for Judge Boasberg to rule that arson is a form of protest. Burn a flag, burn a Tesla, what’s the difference?

How about “Burn a judge”?

Asking for a friend.

Yet Another Tax

March 24, 2025 Kim du Toit Gummint, Taxes and Theft

So Britishland is going to implement a wealth tax — whereby one is taxed (annually) not just upon income, but upon one’s total “wealth”, including such things as property.

How do I know this? From this statement by their Labour Government:

A minister has opened the door to Labour introducing a wealth tax at some point amid pressure from backbenchers to change course ahead of sweeping welfare cuts.

Emma Reynolds said that the Government would reject demands for a 2 per cent levy “for the time being” but did not rule out such a tax at future financial events.

If you’re at all familiar with politician-speak, “did not rule out” means “we’re gonna do it, and sooner than you think”.

And lest you think this villainy is confined to places across The Pond, be aware that it’s a staple position among the Wealth Envious (i.e. most Democrats) Over Here as well.

Step forward, Sen. Pocahantas Warren:

The wealth tax is a cousin of the property tax, but it encompasses all forms of wealth: cash, stocks, jewelry, thoroughbred horses, jets, everything. Warren calls the policy her “Ultra-Millionaire Tax.” It would impose a 2% federal tax on every dollar of a person’s net worth over $50 million and an additional 1% tax on every dollar in net worth over $1 billion. Economists estimate it would hit the 75,000 richest households and raise $2.75 trillion over ten years.

The minute you hear the “t” word (“trillion”) applied to tax revenue, you can see the Socialists’ ears prick up.

Now here’s the fun part.

In 1990, twelve countries in Europe had a wealth tax. Today, there are only three: Norway, Spain, and Switzerland. According to reports by the OECD and others, there were some clear themes with the policy: it was expensive to administer, it was hard on people with lots of assets but little cash, it distorted saving and investment decisions, it pushed the rich and their money out of the taxing countries—and, perhaps worst of all, it didn’t raise much revenue.

Lest you think that this precedent would prevent socialists like Warren and the Labourites from initiating such a tax, you don’t know much about Socialism — where history (especially of failure) is always brushed aside with the airy comment of “But this time, we’ll do it better!”

After the loathsome Emma Reynolds’s little aside, that roaring you hear will be the sound of more (taxable) private jets being readied for takeoff on one-way flights out of the UK — although it should be noted that the roaring has been going on ever since Labour was returned to power last year.