From somewhere on BritTV comes Irish actress Karen Hassan (of the Belfast Hassans, of course), and she’s rather lovely.
I think it’s those green Irish eyes…
From somewhere on BritTV comes Irish actress Karen Hassan (of the Belfast Hassans, of course), and she’s rather lovely.
I think it’s those green Irish eyes…
I was never really fan of Elizabeth Taylor’s acting — that squeaky voice drove me crazy — but was there ever a lovelier woman to look at?
Today, we’ll concentrate on the younger Liz:
Next time we’ll do color, just to see those violet eyes in all their glory.
I’ve spoken about Loretta Young and her sister Polly Ann before, and in the intro to the latter, I said the following:
Actor David Niven once described the Young sisters (Polly Ann, Elizabeth and Loretta) thus: “Each one was prettier than the others.”
So if I’ve looked at Loretta and Polly Ann, then where’s Elizabeth Young?
Here she is; only she changed her stage name to Sally Blane. In the early years:
And later on:
Good grief. Small wonder that David Niven was so frequently a guest at the Young sisters’ house, the old dog. Here he is with Loretta:
It is difficult to read her biography without sorrow for Diana Dors’s career, which consisted mainly of exploitation, outright abuse (e.g. abortions forced on her by her lovers) and a succession of movie roles promised but never fulfilled.
Most of the above came from her appearance — although it must also be said that she was also a naughty, naughty girl — so let’s see what all the fuss was about.
Let’s look at the tout ensemble now:
We’ll save the color pics for another time.
When in doubt, go with “Sophia: The Younger Years”, right?
Right?
Like an early-1960s Ferrari: always classic.
Beauty of the visual kind is always subjective and as such, therefore, there will always be differing opinions on the various kinds of beauty. I, for one, find the voluptuous Kelly Brook and Salma Hayek to be exquisite:
…whereas others may refute that, and prefer the more-slender silhouettes of Charlotte Hawkins and Nicole Kidman:
It’s not that I find the latter pair unattractive — not in the slightest — it’s just my preference is for the body shapes of Mlles Brook and Hayek.
In similar fashion, therefore, do I regard Insty’s comment about the Lamborghini Miura interesting:
“I think the Lamborghini Miura was the most beautiful car of its time, but a spoiler doesn’t make it prettier.”
(He’s talking about Liberty Walk’s version of the Miura, by the way, which I think is quite beautiful for a modern car despite the spoiler.)
But the Miura was made between 1966 and 1973, and in terms of beauty, it had some stiff competition in the beauty department during those seven years. Here’s the “traditional” Miura:
…which I agree is an absolute stunner. The 4-liter V-12 engine didn’t hurt, either.
Then again, if we’re looking at the 1966-1973 years, there’s my personal favorite, the Dino 246 GT:
…and also from that period, the Bizzarrini Strada / Spyder:
…not to mention the incomparable Jaguar E-type:
Okay, as far as I’m concerned that whole decade (1963 – 1972) was the golden age of automotive body design, and there is scarcely a car made back then that I wouldn’t take in a heartbeat.
All more beautiful than anything made so far in the 21st century — in my opinion.
But you all knew that already.