From the inimitable Laurence Fox:
Why yes, Laurence, yes they have. And every time people like you stand for election to roll back or prevent the above, they are roundly defeated in the polls.
Clearly, the Islamification of Britain is something most Britons want.
Now go and make your evening prayers, facing towards Mecca of course, and tell your houri sister to cover up her body.
…or be stoned to death.
Prompted by Insty’s article about journalism:
Nobody ever became a journalist in order to become popular. The broad-stroke portrayals in movies and novels taught us, accurately enough, that journalists tend toward the coarse, vulgar, impudent and nosy. For many years, journalists were generally admired for those attributes in the way that the beef butcher is admired for the scars on his hands.
But thanks, in part, to a fall in status, as well as ever-irrational attacks from politicians like Donald Trump, today’s journalists routinely experience ridicule and harassment at public events like rallies and demonstrations. They’re not precisely pariahs in the new environment, but they’re no longer considered heroes in many places. Journalists don’t deserve any special pity, it should be noted. Police officers, teachers and even doctors often suffer more from the slings and arrows of the mob. But for journalists, the fall has been spectacular and seems never-ending.
Oh boo-hoo-hoo. And:
“Every mainstream media narrative of the last five years has been wrong, if you really think about it, or skewed or morphed into something,” Adam Carolla said. “They’ve been wrong. And not wrong around the edges… there’s always wrong around the edges. They’ve been flat-out fucking wrong about all of it.”
“If you were to talk to some of the people who reported it, they would be confused,” Dr. Pinsky added of journalists who cannot be shamed for their egregious errors.
…so I created this:
Feel free to copy and share.
From Airstrip One, home of the telescreen, comes this news:
A.I. speed cameras can detect how fast someone is travelling and send a report on the make, model and number plate of a vehicle to the police – but some Brits are concerned over privacy.
And of course, there’s always a willing number of the Terminally Supine who are only too pleased to lick those chains:
Louise Thomas, from Confused.com car insurance thinks it will help improve safety and protect both road users and pedestrians. “A.I. speed cameras will help catch drivers who break the law when behind the wheel, such as driving without wearing a seatbelt or for using their phone,” she said.
And no doubt, she would support compulsory implanting of microscopic ships into drivers’ brains, to cut the cost of the cameras and make surveillance of same much more “efficient”.
As for that “concern over the loss of privacy” thing: I hate to break it to you Brits, but for you that ship sailed so long ago, it’s already begun the return voyage.
Enjoy the taste of metal on your tongues.
I see that the NYPD finally came to the city’s rescue and started arresting the fuzzies at the Columbia campus.
My only problem is that the arrests were probably made with 2024-style decorum, i.e. not featuring the “batons, tear gas and dogs” methodology of the early 1960s. Especially the dogs:
Man, I miss those days…
Paid ‘Professional Agitators’ Are Fomenting Violence on America’s Campuses
…leading to the question: so who is doing the paying? Silly rabbits:
George Soros-Connected Groups Paying for Antisemitic Campus Protests, Calling for Revolution
…which in turn leads to my question: Why hasn’t this old fucking Nazi’s U.S. citizenship been revoked yet?
Canadian Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre was booted from the House of Commons for the day on Tuesday after a heated exchange where he refused the House Speaker’s request that he remove from the record his comment calling Prime Minister Justin Trudeau a “wacko” and “extremist.”
So much for that “parliamentary privilege” thing in Fidel Trudeau’s Canukistan, eh?
Firstly, under parliamentary privilege, the House Speaker can only “deplore” or “censure” scurrilous language — expulsion for expressing an opinion is strictly disallowed in a parliamentary setting — and secondly, even without parliamentary rule, it’s an abridgement of the politician’s freedom of speech. (I know, I know: foolish Kim for believing that such things still exist.)
I guess none of that applies anymore in Castro Country.